Charge Generation Pathways in Organic Solar Cells: Assessing the Contribution from the Electron Acceptor

Abstract

Photocurrent generation in organic bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells is most commonly understood as a process which predominantly involves photoexcitation of the lower ionization potential species (donor) followed by electron transfer to the higher electron affinity material (acceptor) [i.e., photoinduced electron transfer (PET), which we term Channel I]. A mirror process also occurs in which photocurrent is generated through photoexcitation of the acceptor followed by hole transfer to the nonexcited donor or photoinduced hole transfer (PHT), which we term Channel II. The role of Channel II photocurrent generation has often been neglected due to overlap of the individual absorption spectra of the donor and acceptor materials that are commonly used. More recently Channel II charge generation has been explored for several reasons. First, many of the new high-efficiency polymeric donors are used as the minority component in bulk heterojunction blends, and therefore, the acceptor absorption is a significant fraction of the total; second, nonfullerene acceptors have been prepared, which through careful design, allow for spectral separation from the donor material, facilitating fundamental studies on charge generation. In this article, we review the methodologies for investigating the two charge generation channels. We also discuss the factors that affect charge generation via Channel I and II pathways, including energy levels of the materials involved, exciton diffusion, and other considerations. Finally, we take a comprehensive look at the nonfullerene acceptor literature and discuss what information about Channel I and Channel II can be obtained from the experiments conducted and what other experiments could be undertaken to provide further information about the operational efficiencies of Channels I and II.

Eco‐Compatible Solvent‐Processed Organic Photovoltaic Cells with Over 16% Efficiency

“…[4][5][6] Benefiting from the great efforts devoted to the design of new materials, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] optimization of the blend morphology, [14][15][16][17][18] understanding the charge generation mechanism, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] significant progress has been achieved in the last few years. [4][5][6] Benefiting from the great efforts devoted to the design of new materials, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] optimization of the blend morphology, [14][15][16][17][18] understanding the charge generation mechanism, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] significant progress has been achieved in the last few years.…”

Elucidating the Spatial Arrangement of Emitter Molecules in Organic Light‐Emitting Diode Films

“…Thes patial distribution of the guest and host molecules in af ilm is important for understanding the behavior of phosphorescent emitters used in OLEDs,a s well as other materials such as thermally-activated delayed fluorescence emitters [3,4] and low donor content solar cells. [5] Films of phosphorescent light-emitting materials can undergo triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA), with the level dependent on the spatial distribution of the emitters. [6] Fçrster-type TTAt ends to be inefficient for low concentration blends of emissive iridium(III) complexes due to poor spectral overlap of their emission and absorption spectra.…”

Recent Progress in Molecular Design of Fused Ring Electron Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells

“…In OSCs, conversion of incident photons into the electric current involved four steps (Figure ): i) formation of intramolecular exciton upon absorption of photons; ii) exciton diffusion to ED and EA interfaces; where iii) it dissociates to form a germinate pair; and iv) charge separated and electron and holes are collected by the respective electrodes under an internal electric field . As excitons have very short lifetimes and exciton diffusion length is only 5–20 nm in BHJ, excitons must dissociate efficiently to maximize the PCE .…”