Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.65.051502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge fluctuations and counterion condensation

Abstract: We predict a condensation phenomenon in an overall neutral system, consisting of a single charged plate and its oppositely charged counterions. Based on the "two-fluid" model, in which the counterions are divided into a "free" and a "condensed" fraction, we argue that for high surface charge, fluctuations can lead to a phase transition in which a large fraction of counterions is condensed. Furthermore, we show that depending on the valence, the condensation is either a first-order or a smooth transition. 61.20… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
84
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(22 reference statements)
9
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with the preceding results, the counterionic density in the immediate vicinity of the charged cylinder increases for increasing Ξ exhibiting large deviations from the mean-field prediction (see Ref. [74] for a similar trend at charged plates). For a given surface charge density σ s , the observed trend is predicted, e.g., for increasing counterion valency, q, since the coupling parameter scales as Ξ ∼ q 3 (Eq.…”
Section: Electrostatic Correlations At Surface and For Large ξsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In agreement with the preceding results, the counterionic density in the immediate vicinity of the charged cylinder increases for increasing Ξ exhibiting large deviations from the mean-field prediction (see Ref. [74] for a similar trend at charged plates). For a given surface charge density σ s , the observed trend is predicted, e.g., for increasing counterion valency, q, since the coupling parameter scales as Ξ ∼ q 3 (Eq.…”
Section: Electrostatic Correlations At Surface and For Large ξsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Here we employ the two state model (figure 1) in which counterions are divided into two classes, namely, condensed and non-condensed (free) ions [12]: some of counterions can bind to an oppositely charged surface, in spite of entropic penalty, due to the electrostatic attraction being greater than the thermal energy. On the other hand, counterions tend to remain in the bulk to gain entropy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] For example, one surprising phenomenon beyond MF theory is the so-called fluctuation-driven counterion condensation in a simple system with single charged surface and its oppositely charged counterions. [11][12][13][14] Another interesting phenomenon is the attraction between two highly likely-charged surface immersed in electrolytes or polar solution, [14][15][16][17][18] as observed in experiments and in computer simulations. These phenomena cannot be captured within PB theories [19][20][21] as PB theory only predicts pure repulsion between likely-charged surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%