“…2. Here also the S 11 (1535) is [14], Richards [11], Morrison [70], Deinet [9], Debenham [12], Crouch [71], Brown [7], Feltesse [10], Bulos [8,72], and Clajus [13]. The inserted box shows the near-threshold energy range.…”
Section: Observables For γ P → η Pmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The situation is very different for the π − p → ηn reaction. Actually, the data come mainly from measurements performed in the 1970s [7][8][9][10][11][12] and suffer from some inconsistencies [13]. A recent experiment, performed at BNL using the Crystal Ball spectrometer [14], offers a high quality data set, though limited to the close-to-threshold kinematics.…”
Within a chiral constituent quark model approach, η-meson production on the proton via electromagnetic and hadron probes is studied. With few parameters, the differential cross section and polarized beam asymmetry for γp → ηp and differential cross section for π − p → ηn processes are calculated and successfully compared with the data in the center-of-mass energy range from threshold up to 2 GeV. The five known resonances S 11 (1535), S 11 (1650), P 13 (1720), D 13 (1520), and F 15 (1680) are found to be dominant in the reaction mechanisms in both channels. Possible roles played by new resonances are also investigated; and in the photoproduction channel, significant contribution from S 11 and D 15 resonances, with masses around 1715 and 2090 MeV, respectively, are deduced. For the so-called missing resonances, no evidence is found within the investigated reactions. The helicity amplitudes and decay widths of N * → πN, ηN are also presented and found to be consistent with the Particle Data Group values.
“…2. Here also the S 11 (1535) is [14], Richards [11], Morrison [70], Deinet [9], Debenham [12], Crouch [71], Brown [7], Feltesse [10], Bulos [8,72], and Clajus [13]. The inserted box shows the near-threshold energy range.…”
Section: Observables For γ P → η Pmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The situation is very different for the π − p → ηn reaction. Actually, the data come mainly from measurements performed in the 1970s [7][8][9][10][11][12] and suffer from some inconsistencies [13]. A recent experiment, performed at BNL using the Crystal Ball spectrometer [14], offers a high quality data set, though limited to the close-to-threshold kinematics.…”
Within a chiral constituent quark model approach, η-meson production on the proton via electromagnetic and hadron probes is studied. With few parameters, the differential cross section and polarized beam asymmetry for γp → ηp and differential cross section for π − p → ηn processes are calculated and successfully compared with the data in the center-of-mass energy range from threshold up to 2 GeV. The five known resonances S 11 (1535), S 11 (1650), P 13 (1720), D 13 (1520), and F 15 (1680) are found to be dominant in the reaction mechanisms in both channels. Possible roles played by new resonances are also investigated; and in the photoproduction channel, significant contribution from S 11 and D 15 resonances, with masses around 1715 and 2090 MeV, respectively, are deduced. For the so-called missing resonances, no evidence is found within the investigated reactions. The helicity amplitudes and decay widths of N * → πN, ηN are also presented and found to be consistent with the Particle Data Group values.
“…The corresponding theoretical results as well as the experimental data from Refs. [17,18] are shown in Fig. 2, where the dotted and dashed curves stand for the contributions from the nucleon pole and the N * (1535) resonance, respectively, while the solid line stands for the total contributions, which can describe well the experimental data with Λ N = 0.6 GeV and Λ N * = 2.0 GeV.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Along this line, with the near threshold experimental data [17][18][19][20], we reanalysis the π − p → ηn reaction from the production threshold to the center-of-mass energy W ≃ 1.65 GeV by using the effective Lagrangian approach and the isobar model. We payed especial attention to the role of the N * (1535) resonance, while the contribution of nucleon pole is also considered in the present calculation, and we find that the interference terms between the N * (1535) resonance and the nucleon pole are significant.…”
The near threshold π − p → ηn reaction is studied within an effective Lagrangian approach and the isobar model. By considering the contributions from s-and u-channel nucleon pole and N * (1535) resonance, the total and differential cross sections of the π − p → ηn reaction near threshold are calculated. Our theoretical results can fairly reproduce the current experimental data. It is also shown that while the center-of-mass energy lies in the range from the reaction threshold up to 1.65 GeV, s-channel N * (1535) resonance plays the dominant role. The effect from nucleon pole is found to be small but the interference terms between the N * (1535) resonance and the nucleon pole are significant. The contributions from t-channel processes are negligible in the present calculation.
“…For the π − p → K 0 Λ reaction, the data of total cross section and differential cross sections can be obtained in the whole resonance range [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], furthermore, some data of Λ polarization are also obtained in the energy region W < 1.8 GeV [11]. While for the π − p → ηn reaction, a few precise data on the differential cross sections and total cross section can be obtained near the N(1535)S 11 mass threshold from Crystal Ball spectrometer at BNL [16], however, other old data [17][18][19][20][21][22] might be problematic over the whole energy range for its limited angle coverage and uncontrollable uncertainties [23]. Thus, to get reliable information on the resonance properties, a combined analysis of the π − p → K 0 Λ and ηn reactions is necessary before new precise data are obtained.…”
A combined analysis of the reactions π − p → K 0 Λ and ηn is carried out with a chiral quark model. The data in the center-of-mass (c.m.) energy range from threshold up to W ≃ 1.8 GeV are reasonably described. For π − p → K 0 Λ, it is found that N(1535)S 11 and N(1650)S 11 paly crucial roles near threshold. The N(1650)S 11 resonance contributes to the reaction through configuration mixing with N(1535)S 11 . The constructive interference between N(1535)S 11 and N(1650)S 11 is responsible for the peak structure around threshold in the total cross section. The n-pole, u-and t-channel backgrounds provide significant contributions to the reaction as well. While, for the π − p → ηn process, the "first peak" in the total cross section is dominant by N(1535)S 11 , which has a sizeable destructive interference with N(1650)S 11 . Around P π ≃ 1.0 GeV/c (W ≃ 1.7 GeV), there seems to be a small bump structure in the total cross section, which might be explained by the interference between the u-channel and N(1650)S 11 . The N(1520)D 13 resonance notably affects the angle distributions of the cross sections, although less effects are seen in the total cross section. The role of P-wave state N(1720)P 13 should be further confirmed by future experiments. If N(1720)P 13 has a narrow width of Γ ≃ 120 MeV as found in our previous work by a study of the π 0 photoproduction processes, obvious evidence should be seen in the π − p → K 0 Λ and ηn processes as well.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.