1981
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(81)90477-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge distributions in low-energy nuclear fission and their relevance to fission dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same figure the elemental yield profile in 252Cf (S.F.) as reported by Mariolopoulos et al [15] is shown assuming same yields for the charge complementary fission product elements. It is seen that (1) the angular momentum profile has sharp fluctuations with the odd Z fragments having higher angular momenta compared to the neighbouring even Z fragments; (2) the profiles of angular momentum and elemental yields are nearly of inverse nature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the same figure the elemental yield profile in 252Cf (S.F.) as reported by Mariolopoulos et al [15] is shown assuming same yields for the charge complementary fission product elements. It is seen that (1) the angular momentum profile has sharp fluctuations with the odd Z fragments having higher angular momenta compared to the neighbouring even Z fragments; (2) the profiles of angular momentum and elemental yields are nearly of inverse nature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Figure I shows that the B values for 132I are different in the fissioning nuclei 234U and 236U having comparable excitation energy and the neutron number of the complementary fragment (Nc) are away from 66. To investigate this aspect and any correlation between angular momentum and fission yield (as reported for a single fissioning nuclide [3]), fragment angular momentum for 131I and elemental yields of This figure does not include the elemental yields reported by Reisdorf et al [32] which does not manifest the usual odd-even systematics [26][27][28][29][30][31] perhapes due to the use of average x-ray yields. Angular momentum of 134I [3,10] in various fissioning nuclei are also plotted in the same figure for comparison.…”
Section: Calculation Of Deformation Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two Figure 1. Calculated charge distribution compared with experimental data taken from [15][16][17]. The configurations allowed in the (β 1 , β 2 ) plane are chosen such that the quasifission barrier is greater than 1.15 MeV.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%