2007
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge distribution on narrow MEMS beams of nearly square cross‐section

Abstract: SUMMARYThe subject of this paper is the calculation of charge distribution on the surfaces of thin conducting microelectromechanical systems beams, of nearly square cross-section, in electrostatic problems, by the boundary element method (BEM). A line model of a beam is proposed here. This model overcomes the problem of dealing with nearly singular matrices that occur when the standard BEM is applied to very thin features (objects or gaps). This new approach is also very efficient. Numerical results are presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the screening effects due to surface charges are not considered in the present model. However, further improvement of the model requires the inclusion of these effects in calculating the electromechanical response of cantilever nano-actuators [43][44][45]. In nano-structures with the substrate/electrode constructed from semiconductor materials [43] or sensors made of single-walled carbon nanotubes with the diameter approaching the screening length [44], surface charge screening might even swamp nano-scale attractions.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the screening effects due to surface charges are not considered in the present model. However, further improvement of the model requires the inclusion of these effects in calculating the electromechanical response of cantilever nano-actuators [43][44][45]. In nano-structures with the substrate/electrode constructed from semiconductor materials [43] or sensors made of single-walled carbon nanotubes with the diameter approaching the screening length [44], surface charge screening might even swamp nano-scale attractions.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nano-structures with the substrate/electrode constructed from semiconductor materials [43] or sensors made of single-walled carbon nanotubes with the diameter approaching the screening length [44], surface charge screening might even swamp nano-scale attractions. Therefore, the finite size and quantum effects must be considered when calculating the surface charge distribution, especially for narrow beams [45].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%