2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Current Controlled Single Phase Integrated Switched Mode Power factor Correction Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, some complex designs and control methods were presented in [6], which recently introduced a literature review for the boost converter topology, such as the traditional bridge boost converter with PFC, PFC with pseudo-continuous conduction, interleaved PFC, hybrid interleaved PFC, and PFC with a bidirectional switch. However, detailed the emerging disadvantages of such topologies, which include difficulty in implementing control, high cost, and the complexity of the design with high distortions for the used topologies with the boost converter, affecting the efficiency and performance of the converter in various power applications [6], [22]- [24]. Moreover, the proposed design was modified to improve the performance since PF and THD showed 0.9999 and 2.61%, respectively, which is better than those who adopted the same topology as our work in [21], [25].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, some complex designs and control methods were presented in [6], which recently introduced a literature review for the boost converter topology, such as the traditional bridge boost converter with PFC, PFC with pseudo-continuous conduction, interleaved PFC, hybrid interleaved PFC, and PFC with a bidirectional switch. However, detailed the emerging disadvantages of such topologies, which include difficulty in implementing control, high cost, and the complexity of the design with high distortions for the used topologies with the boost converter, affecting the efficiency and performance of the converter in various power applications [6], [22]- [24]. Moreover, the proposed design was modified to improve the performance since PF and THD showed 0.9999 and 2.61%, respectively, which is better than those who adopted the same topology as our work in [21], [25].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%