2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2014.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-conserving FEM–PIC schemes on general grids

Abstract: In this article we aim at proposing a general mathematical formulation for charge conserving finite element Maxwell solvers coupled with particle schemes. In particular, we identify the finite element continuity equations that must be satisfied by the discrete current sources for several classes of time domain Vlasov-Maxwell simulations to preserve the Gauss law at each time step, and propose a generic algorithm for computing such consistent sources. Since our results cover a wide range of schemes (namely curl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These shapes have the advantage of being polynomial on their support unlike spline particles which are made of several polynomial pieces. Because the longterm charge conservation properties of the scheme require an accurate time-average of the particle current in the deposition method as demonstrated in [30,17], this feature actually simplifies the involved algorithms. For more details on these algorithms we refer to [18].…”
Section: Compatible Maxwell Solvers With Particles Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These shapes have the advantage of being polynomial on their support unlike spline particles which are made of several polynomial pieces. Because the longterm charge conservation properties of the scheme require an accurate time-average of the particle current in the deposition method as demonstrated in [30,17], this feature actually simplifies the involved algorithms. For more details on these algorithms we refer to [18].…”
Section: Compatible Maxwell Solvers With Particles Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first remedies have been to correct the electric field by solving exact [9] or approximate [51,47] Poisson equations, until Eastwood, Villasenor and Buneman [30,70] noticed that stable solvers could be obtained by an adequate computation of the current from the particles which would preserve a discrete Gauss law. In the framework of curl-conforming finite element method, we have described a generic algorithm in [17], revisited in a geometric perspective in [66,57]. More recently it was noticed that this algorithm fits in a semi-discrete Hamiltonian structure, where the divergence constraints are identified as Casimirs and thus are automatically conserved [46].…”
Section: Compatible Maxwell Solvers With Particles Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This space discretization is standard ans has been studied in, e.g., Ref. [20,19,25,9] where the source term J is approximated with a standard orthogonal projection on V 2 h , leading to define J h by…”
Section: Conforming Finite Elements With a Strong Faraday Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following our stability analysis we would like that the resulting solutions satisfy the proper discrete Gauss laws which involve the structure-preserving divergence operators identified in this work, namely (5.5) and (5.7) respectively. In [9] this construction was described for the conforming FEM method, using a time averaging and an extension of the L 2 projection (5.13) for current densities carried by Dirac particles. Specifically, it was shown that the quantities To assess the basic convergence and stability properties of the proposed schemes we use the analytical current source proposed in [17,12] to study the charge conservation properties of a penalized finite volume scheme.…”
Section: Charge-conserving Coupling With Point Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a discrete version of the continuity equation (6) can be obtained in particle schemes by averaging the time-dependent current density (20) over the time step, and evaluating the charge density at t n (see [2] and the reference therein), we consider the following smoothed, time-averaged current density:…”
Section: Smooth Particle Current Deposition With Numerical Quadraturesmentioning
confidence: 99%