2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(02)00765-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge compensation using optical conductivity enhancement and simple analytical protocols for SIMS of resistive Si1−xGex alloy layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…%, 7 while the results here indicate a similar level of accuracy should be achievable for the extended range of ͑0 Ͻ x Ͻ 1͒ and using reference materials. This level of accuracy is certainly comparable with alternative analytical techniques such as energy dispersive x ray and Auger electron spectroscopy ͑Ϯ2 at.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…%, 7 while the results here indicate a similar level of accuracy should be achievable for the extended range of ͑0 Ͻ x Ͻ 1͒ and using reference materials. This level of accuracy is certainly comparable with alternative analytical techniques such as energy dispersive x ray and Auger electron spectroscopy ͑Ϯ2 at.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…7,19 To test this relationship over a larger range of x, the variation of the individual ion yields with matrix content using different primary beam energies was measured. Mean silicon and germanium ion yields were determined from the flat regions of the profiles shown in Figs.…”
Section: Ion Yield Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies under these conditions showed profiling without any additional artefacts introduced through surface topological changes [11]. Optical conductivity enhancement (OCE) [12] in the form of red laser illumination (λ = 635 nm: power = 2.5 mW: spot size~2 mm at the sample) was used to stabilize the sample surface bias as the material was intrinsic (i.e., highly resistive). Following depth profiling, all craters were measured using a calibrated Dektak (Santa Barbara, California, US) 3030 stylus profilometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small variations in the matrix can have a significant effect upon the final device performance, and so, accurate compositional analysis is required. It has previously been demonstrated that uleSIMS can accurately (±1 at.%) determine the matrix content [3,4] of Si 1−x Ge x layers within the range x ≤ 0.3 by assuming that the Ge + and Si + ion yields are proportional to x and 1 − x, respectively, (and thus, the ratio of the Si + yield from SiGe to that in Si therefore gives x -a self-calibrating measurement in a Si/SiGe system). We show that this simple relationship does not apply to the full range of composition, and determine the more complex behavior required for quantification over 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%