2020
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201902351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Carriers Cascade in a Ternary TiO2/TiO2/ZnS Heterojunction: A DFT Study

Abstract: Composite materials whose band alignment induces a favorable separation of photogenerated electrons and holes often reveal a stronger photocatalytic activity compared to their separate components. As shown by experiments, titania composites display a heterojunction between the anatase (101)‐(001) surfaces, where the former stabilizes electrons and the latter the holes. In principle, an even more efficient carriers separation is achieved if a third component with high hole‐stabilizing capability, ZnS(110), is g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(197 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42,43 The band offsets were calculated by aligning the band edges of the composing units using as a reference the energy of the 1s core levels, as in XPS measurements, [44][45][46] and in DFT calculations of interfaces, see also the ESI. † [47][48][49][50][51] The calculated valence band offset (VBO), 0.74 eV, and conduction band offsets (CBO), 0.44 eV, are comparable to the measured ones, Fig. 3, with errors that are in the typical range of accuracy of band alignment approaches.…”
Section: Dft Calculationssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…42,43 The band offsets were calculated by aligning the band edges of the composing units using as a reference the energy of the 1s core levels, as in XPS measurements, [44][45][46] and in DFT calculations of interfaces, see also the ESI. † [47][48][49][50][51] The calculated valence band offset (VBO), 0.74 eV, and conduction band offsets (CBO), 0.44 eV, are comparable to the measured ones, Fig. 3, with errors that are in the typical range of accuracy of band alignment approaches.…”
Section: Dft Calculationssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…[ 48,54,58,65 ] In the explicit heterojunction model, the band edges are referred to the V TOP values calculated in independent slabs ( V TOP (010) , V TOP (100) ) and in the junction system ( V TOP (010),junc , V TOP (100),junc ). [ 54,58,66 ] VBO=VBM010VTOP010VBM100VTOP100+VTOP010,juncVTOP100,junc CBO=CBM010VTOP010CBM100VTOP100+VTOP010,juncVTOP100,junc In this way a direct comparison of experimental and calculated band alignment is possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a ternary TiO 2 /TiO 2 /ZnS composite, investigated with the CRYSTAL code and the PBE0 functional. [117] New ZnÀ O and TiÀ S bonds form at the interface between TiO 2 and ZnS giving rise to non-negligible structural reconstruction, also beyond the interfacial region.…”
Section: Tio 2 /Tio 2 /Znsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting band alignment, obtained by considering electronic states on inner layers, is of Type‐II, Figure 9 , and is predicted also by the independent units model. [ 117 , 118 ] The picture provided by the band alignment was assessed by simulating the explicit formation of a hole in the VB and of an electron in the CB according to a singlet‐triplet excitation process. [119] The vertical excitation was followed by a structural relaxation that leads to hole and electron localization and polaron formation.…”
Section: Type‐ii Heterojunctions: Joining Different Facets Of the Same Semiconductormentioning
confidence: 99%