2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40573-014-0021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charakterisierung und Strukturierung von Kontexten im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – Vorschlag einer theoretischen Modellierung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In the discipline of science education, previous studies evaluating the characteristics of contexts come to inconsistent results. Some research has focused on authenticity and familiarity (Van Vorst et al, 2015) while other research has pointed to controversiality (Marks & Eilks, 2010). The findings of the present study reveal the need for "realistic" contexts, which confirms the notion of "authenticity".…”
Section: Characteristics Of Contexts For Cs Educationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the discipline of science education, previous studies evaluating the characteristics of contexts come to inconsistent results. Some research has focused on authenticity and familiarity (Van Vorst et al, 2015) while other research has pointed to controversiality (Marks & Eilks, 2010). The findings of the present study reveal the need for "realistic" contexts, which confirms the notion of "authenticity".…”
Section: Characteristics Of Contexts For Cs Educationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In addition to investigating the source of contexts, previous studies have investigated other characteristics that play a role in determining effective contexts (e.g., Habig et al, 2018;Van Vorst et al, 2015). Van Vorst et al (2015) reviewed the characteristics of contexts stemming from prior research, and suggested a framework with authenticity and familiarity of contexts as main elements. Authenticity involves being genuine and trustworthy.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei der Umsetzung einer Kontextualisierung können verschiedene Kontextdimensionen berücksichtigt werden (Gilbert 2006;van Vorst et al 2015;Walkington und Hayata 2017). Walkington und Hayata (2017) fokussieren in ihrem Ansatz das Kontextualisieren von Lernaufgaben in individuelle Interessen von Schülerinnen und Schülern.…”
Section: Berücksichtigung Der Individuellen Interessen Durch Kontextuunclassified
“…Worldwide, educational curriculum reforms have focused on using contexts within science education as a mean to provide students with direct applicability of science content in their everyday life (Gilbert, 2006;Savelsberg et al, 2016). As discussed by research, such contexts can be classified based on two levels: the surface structure (problem situation) and the deep structure (scientific model) (Löffler et al, 2018;Mestre, 2002;van Vorst et al, 2014). Following this approach, Löffler and Kauertz (2016) established a context model that allows the identification of sets of information at the surface level and the deep level, and at the same time, pinpointing sets of information that link both levels together.…”
Section: Context Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%