1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(97)01464-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characters and modular properties of permutation orbifolds

Abstract: Explicit formulae describing the genus one characters and modular transformation properties of permutation orbifolds of arbitrary Rational Conformal Field Theories are presented, and their relation to the theory of covering surfaces is investigated.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
134
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Λ of su(m) is defined in the following way: 4) where Λ i are the fundamental weights of su(m) and λ i are the Dynkin labels.…”
Section: The W (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Λ of su(m) is defined in the following way: 4) where Λ i are the fundamental weights of su(m) and λ i are the Dynkin labels.…”
Section: The W (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first introduced in [35,24] on RCFTs characterized as the tensor product of m copies of a given RCFT. The subject was further developed in [26,25,17,7,4,21,5], and it was also studied by using the approach of the m-reduction technique in [37,13,14]. A more complete classification has been recently presented in [2], where the orbifold construction is applied in the more general framework of the lattice vertex algebras (which are not simply tensor products of RCFTs).…”
Section: (328)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4.3 are in contradiction to what can be derived from certain statements in [2], which in turn follow from [1]. This claim was wrong, being based on an erroneous deduction from the statements in [1,2]. I regret this mistake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…I regret this mistake. In fact, Bantay has provided me with a convincing argument to the effect that my Corollary 4.15 can also be deduced from the results of his earlier article [1]. His argument relies on the formula [1, Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%