2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607097104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the unfolded states of proteins using single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and molecular simulations

Abstract: To obtain quantitative information on the size and dynamics of unfolded proteins we combined single-molecule lifetime and intensity FRET measurements with molecular simulations. We compared the unfolded states of the 64-residue, ␣/␤ protein L and the 66-residue, all-␤ cold-shock protein CspTm. The average radius of gyration (R g) calculated from FRET data on freely diffusing molecules was identical for the two unfolded proteins at guanidinium chloride concentrations >3 M, and the FRET-derived R g of protein L … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

34
440
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(59 reference statements)
34
440
6
Order By: Relevance
“…where P (R ee ) is the end-to-end distance, R ee , probability distribution function of the protein, FRET overestimates radius of gyration in high [GuHCl]: We mimicked the FRET experiments 21,22 to estimate R F RET g from E Burst . The Gaussian polymer chain end-toend probability distribution is given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where P (R ee ) is the end-to-end distance, R ee , probability distribution function of the protein, FRET overestimates radius of gyration in high [GuHCl]: We mimicked the FRET experiments 21,22 to estimate R F RET g from E Burst . The Gaussian polymer chain end-toend probability distribution is given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the R g predictions of FRET 21,22 and SAXS 24,25 experiments for Protein L during the burst-phase of folding is statistically significant. The reasons for the disagreement between these experiments for Protein L are not completely clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A sensitive tool for monitoring the assembly of macromolecules and their kinetics is fluorescence microscopy, by virtue of imaging the dynamics of fluorescent dyes attached to the molecules of interest. Recently, fluorescent imaging techniques have been developed for individual molecules, allowing the monitoring of molecular interactions at the single molecule level (Blanchard et al 2004;Coban et al 2006;Deniz et al 1999;Dietrich et al 2002;Friedman et al 2006;Gell et al 2006;Ha 2001Ha , 2004Merchant et al 2007;Murphy et al 2004;Myong et al 2006;Rueda et al 2004;Yasuda et al 2003). These new techniques provide unique information about the natural heterogeneity (structural and dynamics) of individual macromolecules, and allow the analysis of interactions between the molecules, the dynamics of complex formation, determination of the stoichiometry of the complex and calculation of the spatial distance between specific molecules in a complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, the information about inter-dye distance is extracted from FRET efficiency histograms which are often approximated by a Gaussian function (Agrawal et al 2008;Coban et al 2006;Deniz et al 1999;Dietrich et al 2002;Ha 2001;Iqbal et al 2008a; Kapanidis et al 2004;Koopmans et al 2007; Kuzmenkina et al 2006;Lee et al 2005;Merchant et al 2007;Murphy et al 2004;Nir et al 2006;Sabanayagam et al 2005;Schuler et al 2005;Sugawa et al 2007;Yildiz and Selvin 2005;Yim et al 2005;Zhang et al 2007). The apparent width of thus extracted histograms is usually in the range of 0.07-0.2 (on a scale of 0-1) and often ascribed to variations of the interdye distance (Coban et al 2006;Dietrich et al 2002;Merchant et al 2007;Schuler et al 2005;Sugawa et al 2007). Here we describe an approach to discern the contributions of various factors to the apparent width of FRET distribution, showing that photon shot noise and modulations of orientation factor due to helix flexibilities are the main sources for the experimentally observed width of the FRET distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%