2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5d30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Uncertainty in Cluster Magnetic Fields Derived from Rotation Measures

Abstract: Magnetic fields play vital roles in intracluster media (ICMs), but estimating their strengths and distributions from observations is a major challenge. Faraday rotation measures (RMs) are widely applied to this task, so it is critical to understand inherent uncertainties in RM analysis. In this paper, we seek to characterize those uncertainties given the types of information available today, independent of the specific technique used. We conduct synthetic RM observations through the ICM of a galaxy cluster dra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where B 0 = 4.7 µG and η B = 0.5. We note, however, that uncertainties on these parameters are relatively large and the parameters are degenerate (see also the recent work by Johnson et al 2020). They are constrained in the range ( B 0 = 3.9 µG; η B = 0.4) to ( B 0 = 5.4 µG; η B = 0.7) (see Bonafede et al 2010, for more details).…”
Section: Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…where B 0 = 4.7 µG and η B = 0.5. We note, however, that uncertainties on these parameters are relatively large and the parameters are degenerate (see also the recent work by Johnson et al 2020). They are constrained in the range ( B 0 = 3.9 µG; η B = 0.4) to ( B 0 = 5.4 µG; η B = 0.7) (see Bonafede et al 2010, for more details).…”
Section: Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The reasons for a non-detection of synchrotron emission from the bridge region at the level of A399-401, for example, may lie in the absence of any one of the four points mentioned at the beginning of this section. If we assume that the relation between thermal gas density and magnetic field strength found in galaxy clusters is also valid in the intercluster region, we can estimate the magnetic field strength using the observed scaling B ∝ n 0.5 e (Johnson et al 2020). In cluster centres with electron number densities of n e ∼ 0.1 cm −3 , typical field values of 1-10 µG are observed.…”
Section: Upper Limit On the Radio Bridgementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using φ peak,res,char ∼ σ φpeak,res,cluster ≈ 17 rad m -2 , we get M Thermal ≈ 2.4 × 10 11 1 BμG M , which for comparison, is approximately three times the mass of the X-ray-emitting hot ICM (but see Johnson et al 2020 for discussion of inherent uncertainties in such measurements). If there are typically N magnetic field reversals along the LOS to sources in our sample, M Thermal will be larger by a factor of ∼N 1/2 .…”
Section: Mass and Phase Of The Ionised Cluster Gasmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can distribute μG-level magnetic fields throughout cluster volumes (e.g. Xu et al 2009), inducing significant variability in the Faraday rotation signal of clusters with otherwise similar properties (Xu et al 2011), and degeneracies in the interpretation of such data (Johnson et al 2020). Nevertheless, following Anderson et al (2018), we can crudely estimate the baryonic gas mass generating the Faraday depth enhancement as follows.…”
Section: Mass and Phase Of The Ionised Cluster Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%