1974
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(74)90076-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the natural order of application of phonological rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Brink (1974) suggests that Dutch zingt, normally pronounced [zirjt], undergoes both a &-epenthesis (which he motivates by reference to a proposed derivation /konirj-tJ3/->konin-k-tja->[koninkJ3]) and a ^-deletion (illustrated by /zink-t/->[zirjt]), so that its derivation is: /zirj-t/->zirj-k-t-»[zint]; I would be inclined to favour an analysis in which the k of [koninkja] was derived via assimilation and not by insertion, with the lexical representation of -tjd (the diminutive suffix) being something like C*j$, where C* becomes homorganic phonetic shapes, or a theory of syntax which recognized only a surface level. The proposals I know of for theories along these lines seem to me to be demonstrably inadequate, but that is not my topic here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Brink (1974) suggests that Dutch zingt, normally pronounced [zirjt], undergoes both a &-epenthesis (which he motivates by reference to a proposed derivation /konirj-tJ3/->konin-k-tja->[koninkJ3]) and a ^-deletion (illustrated by /zink-t/->[zirjt]), so that its derivation is: /zirj-t/->zirj-k-t-»[zint]; I would be inclined to favour an analysis in which the k of [koninkja] was derived via assimilation and not by insertion, with the lexical representation of -tjd (the diminutive suffix) being something like C*j$, where C* becomes homorganic phonetic shapes, or a theory of syntax which recognized only a surface level. The proposals I know of for theories along these lines seem to me to be demonstrably inadequate, but that is not my topic here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'obsession historiquement compréhensible qu'a cette dernière pour les faits de surface ne lui a jamais permis de rendre compte des contextes de sandhi externe (cf. Brink 1974et Eliasson 1976) et des variantes allegro (cf. Singh 1982.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified