2023
DOI: 10.1038/s42256-023-00634-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the interaction conformation between T-cell receptors and epitopes with deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study provides a useful groundwork for our better understanding of the interaction conformation between T-cell receptors and epitopes. We plan to integrate multivariate prior biological and biomedical knowledge and design highly interpretable model architectures to develop advanced deep learning methods for predicting of T cell receptor-epitope binding specificity (Lu, et al, 2021; Peng, et al, 2023; Racle, et al, 2023) in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study provides a useful groundwork for our better understanding of the interaction conformation between T-cell receptors and epitopes. We plan to integrate multivariate prior biological and biomedical knowledge and design highly interpretable model architectures to develop advanced deep learning methods for predicting of T cell receptor-epitope binding specificity (Lu, et al, 2021; Peng, et al, 2023; Racle, et al, 2023) in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VAEs in peptide-MHC binding optimization have great potential for advancing the design of vaccines and immunotherapies ( 103 ). One recent study, TCR–Epitope Interaction Modelling at Residue Level (TEIM-Res) ( 104 ), uses the sequences of TCRs and epitopes as inputs to predict pairwise residue distances and contact sites. An epitope feature vector generated by an AE is fed into an interaction extractor for global epitope information.…”
Section: Tcr-pmhc Specificity Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While traditional experimental techniques for studying PPIs, such as yeast two-hybrid screening 7 , co-immunoprecipitation 8 , pull-down assays 9 , and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) 10 , are effective, they often require extensive labor and substantial financial investment. To address these challenges, advancements in computational tools and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have transformed the study of PPIs 11 . These in-silico strategies leverage expansive datasets to predict PPIs, enabling interaction site prediction 12 , interaction type classification 9 , and binding affinity prediction 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%