2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the binding interactions of PFOA and PFOS with catalase at the molecular level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar effects have been observed in somatic cells, where it has been reported that PFOA can increase ROS production and cause deregulation of genes involved in cell division, causing DNA damage and apoptosis 46–50 . The observed increase of ROS in the present study may be based on the damage to the antioxidative system, as it has been previously reported 51 . Our results show that the major source of ROS in PFOA‐exposed CC is the mitochondria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar effects have been observed in somatic cells, where it has been reported that PFOA can increase ROS production and cause deregulation of genes involved in cell division, causing DNA damage and apoptosis 46–50 . The observed increase of ROS in the present study may be based on the damage to the antioxidative system, as it has been previously reported 51 . Our results show that the major source of ROS in PFOA‐exposed CC is the mitochondria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[46][47][48][49][50] The observed increase of ROS in the present study may be based on the damage to the antioxidative system, as it has been previously reported. 51 Our results show that the major source of ROS in PFOA-exposed CC is the mitochondria. If the antioxidant system is damaged, these ROS could cause lipid peroxidation of mitochondrial membranes causing leakage of ions, which may affect the proton gradient and the oxidative phosphorylation required to produce ATP, thus contributing to further ROS generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Like studies in vivo, catalase (CAT) was inhibited by PFOS in vitro at high concentrations, greater than 10 µM. However, PFOA had no significant effect on CAT activity (Xu et al, 2018). The authors also studied binding interactions between both PFCs and CAT and, noting decreased αhelix and increased β-sheets contents in the enzyme structure, inhibition by PFOS could be explained by the bind of the fluorinated compounds close to the enzyme's active site, while the binding site for PFOA was on the surface of the enzyme.…”
Section: Studies Ex Vivo and In Vitro On Fluorinated Organic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The strong absorption peak at 208 nm is related to the protein backbone, which is caused by the π-π* transition of C=O in the polypeptide chain backbone associated with helix-coil transformation; the peak at 280 nm is related to the absorption of aromatic amino acids. 37,38 As shown in Fig. 3, as the concentration of DHA-S increased, the absorption intensity of HSA at 208 nm was continuously weakened with a slight red shift, but the characteristic absorption peak of aromatic amino acids near 280 nm did not change significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%