2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing stand-level forest canopy cover and height using Landsat time series, samples of airborne LiDAR, and the Random Forest algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
83
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Canopy height derived from airborne Lidar was correlated with both TCT variables and disturbance information obtained from a trajectory-based disturbance characterization method (Table 3), and a strong positive correlation is found between Lidar-derived MCH and the TCA. Our study has confirmed that TCA is particularly a well suited index to long-term change detection studies that include MSS data (e.g., [18,30]). Several other spectral variables or indices can also be used for disturbance characterization especially when MSS data are not included in the time series.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Canopy height derived from airborne Lidar was correlated with both TCT variables and disturbance information obtained from a trajectory-based disturbance characterization method (Table 3), and a strong positive correlation is found between Lidar-derived MCH and the TCA. Our study has confirmed that TCA is particularly a well suited index to long-term change detection studies that include MSS data (e.g., [18,30]). Several other spectral variables or indices can also be used for disturbance characterization especially when MSS data are not included in the time series.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The random selection of independent variables is performed at each level of the tree. A comprehensive explanation of the algorithm can be found in Breiman [63,64] and its application for forest parameter estimation can be found in Hudak et al [42], McInerney and Nieuwenhuis [65], Powell et al [30], Gleason and Im [66] and Ahmed et al [18]. The RF modeling was performed using the "random forest" package [67] in R statistical language [61].…”
Section: Mean Canopy Height Estimation Using Multiple Regression and mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, our results are similar to previous stand-level height estimation. For example, Ahmed et al [49] modeled forest heights at the stand level with Landsat time series images and airborne LiDAR data using multiple regression and RF. Their RF models resulted in R 2 of 0.88, RMSE of 2.39 m for mature forests, R 2 of 0.79, RMSE of 3.52 m for young forests, and R 2 of 0.82, RMSE of 3.17 m for combined forests.…”
Section: Validation Of Forest Stand Height Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%