2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing solar-type stars from full-length Kepler data sets using the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal

Abstract: The Kepler space telescope yielded unprecedented data for the study of solar-like oscillations in other stars. The large samples of multi-year observations posed an enormous data analysis challenge that has only recently been surmounted. Asteroseismic modeling has become more sophisticated over time, with better methods gradually developing alongside the extended observations and improved data analysis techniques. We apply the latest version of the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal (AMP) to the full-length Kepler … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(134 reference statements)
9
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The asteroseismic rotation rates and ages for a ∼3 Gyr-old solar analog binary system (White et al, 2017) have been overplotted, validating asteroseismic rotation measurements and the age scale for sun-like Kepler stars. A few well-characterized solar analogs are shown with yellow points, including 18 Sco (Petit et al, 2008;Li et al, 2012;Mittag et al, 2016), α Cen A (Bazot et al, 2007;Bazot, Bourguignon, and ChristensenDalsgaard, 2012), and 16 Cyg A & B Creevey et al, 2017). Although some uncertainties remain for 18 Sco and α Cen A, these bright stars appear to follow the same pattern of anomalous rotation observed in the Kepler sample.…”
Section: Breakdown Of Magnetic Brakingmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The asteroseismic rotation rates and ages for a ∼3 Gyr-old solar analog binary system (White et al, 2017) have been overplotted, validating asteroseismic rotation measurements and the age scale for sun-like Kepler stars. A few well-characterized solar analogs are shown with yellow points, including 18 Sco (Petit et al, 2008;Li et al, 2012;Mittag et al, 2016), α Cen A (Bazot et al, 2007;Bazot, Bourguignon, and ChristensenDalsgaard, 2012), and 16 Cyg A & B Creevey et al, 2017). Although some uncertainties remain for 18 Sco and α Cen A, these bright stars appear to follow the same pattern of anomalous rotation observed in the Kepler sample.…”
Section: Breakdown Of Magnetic Brakingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Note that the solar age and rotation rate (marked with a symbol) were used to calibrate the standard model beyond the 0.5-2.5 Gyr age range of clusters. Asteroseismic ages for the Kepler sample (black points and 16 Cyg) have been updated with values from Creevey et al (2017). The shaded region represents the expected dispersion due to the range of masses and metallicities within the sample (e.g., the two high points are lower metallicity stars, giving them thinner convection zones that reach the critical Rossby number at faster rotation rates).…”
Section: Breakdown Of Magnetic Brakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in the mixing length of the atmosphere model of the magnitude discussed here will therefore not impact our results. We note that detailed seismic modeling of dwarfs and subgiants suggests a range of mixing lengths that depend on temperature, composition, and gravity (see e.g., Bonaca et al 2012;Metcalfe et al 2014;Creevey et al 2017;Silva Aguirre et al 2017). However, none of these studies have more than a single star in the more evolved gravity ranges we are considering.…”
Section: A Metallicity-dependent Mixing Lengthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We have used the latest version of the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal (AMP, [27]) to obtain reliable stellar properties from the complete Kepler data sets ( [28]). For each star in the sample, we repeated the modeling with and without a luminosity constraint derived from Gaia DR1 parallaxes ( [2]), allowing us to isolate the impact of this constraint on the inferred stellar properties.…”
Section: Asteroseismology With Keplermentioning
confidence: 99%