The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291715002111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing social environment's association with neurocognition using census and crime data linked to the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort

Abstract: Environment-level variables can be combined to create factor scores or composites for use in larger statistical models. Our results are consistent with literature indicating that individual-level socio-demographic characteristics (e.g. race and gender) and aspects of familial social capital (e.g. parental education) have statistical relationships with neurocognitive performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, information about parental characteristics was somewhat limited, but our adjustment for social disadvantage (e.g., poverty, crowding, crime) in the models, even though not an individual-level variable, can inform potential social environmental factors on these conditions in youth. 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, information about parental characteristics was somewhat limited, but our adjustment for social disadvantage (e.g., poverty, crowding, crime) in the models, even though not an individual-level variable, can inform potential social environmental factors on these conditions in youth. 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Characterization of the social environment is described in detail in Moore et al 27 Briefly, we linked participant address information to 2010 census and crime data, and then completed exploratory factor analysis to derive social and criminal dimensions of participants’ environments. These were used to calculate environment-level scores, and were merged with individual-level variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This community cohort is racially (56% Caucasian, 33% African American and 11% other) and socioeconomically diverse (Moore et al, 2016). From the remaining pool (N = 13,598), 2,699 declined to participate, 1,401 were excluded, and 9,498 youths were enrolled.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the remaining pool (N = 13,598), 2,699 declined to participate, 1,401 were excluded, and 9,498 youths were enrolled. This community cohort is racially (56% Caucasian, 33% African American and 11% other) and socioeconomically diverse (Moore et al, 2016). The clinical assessment was administered to caregivers or legal guardians, who were considered collateral informants, for participants ages 8-10; to probands and collateral informants for probands ages 11-17; and to probands for participants ages 18-21.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables obtained from census data were factor analyzed and reduced to two factors: socioeconomic status (SES) and household environment (Moore et al, 2016). The SES factor reflects percent of residents in poverty, median family income, and percent of residents who are married.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%