2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1876952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing seismic noise in the 2–20 Hz band at a gravitational wave observatory

Abstract: We present a study of seismic noise, using an array of seismic sensors, at the Australian International Gravitational Observatory. We show that despite excellent attenuation of 2–20 Hz seismic waves from the soil properties of the site, which is confirmed by a specific experiment, there are important technical issues associated with local sources of vibration originating from within the laboratory buildings. In particular, we identify vibrations from air-filtration equipment propagating throughout the site. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some channels, like from Upper Sand Hill, also showed minor, narrow frequency peaks. Characteristics of high frequency seismic noise at any one location could be related to varying road features (road turn, stop sign, stop light), nontransportation seismic sources such as building resonance, hydrological pumps or mechanical motors (Coward et al, 2005), soil thickness, and seismic velocity in the upper 30 m (Dou et al, 2017; Nakamura, 1989), the coupling condition of the fiber sensor at that position in the array (Ajo‐Franklin et al, 2019). Significant PSD reductions of up to 7 dB were observed at most channels beginning after the first week in March (black traces) to the last day (solid color; transparency decreases with time) in Figure 2b (analyzed in greater detail below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some channels, like from Upper Sand Hill, also showed minor, narrow frequency peaks. Characteristics of high frequency seismic noise at any one location could be related to varying road features (road turn, stop sign, stop light), nontransportation seismic sources such as building resonance, hydrological pumps or mechanical motors (Coward et al, 2005), soil thickness, and seismic velocity in the upper 30 m (Dou et al, 2017; Nakamura, 1989), the coupling condition of the fiber sensor at that position in the array (Ajo‐Franklin et al, 2019). Significant PSD reductions of up to 7 dB were observed at most channels beginning after the first week in March (black traces) to the last day (solid color; transparency decreases with time) in Figure 2b (analyzed in greater detail below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16.7 Hz) are sinusoidal‐type seismic waves most probably excited by rotating machinery at sharp frequencies. Examples are electrical motors and gearboxes of industrial machinery (Plesinger & Wielandt 1974; Bokelmann & Baisch 1999; Kar & Mohanty 2006), power generators and building services machinery (Coward et al 2005). Due to gear boxes and frequency converters such sinusoidal signals can be observed in the whole frequency range from 1 Hz up to the power frequency (50 Hz) but predominantly around 12.5 Hz (eight poles engines), 16.67 Hz (six poles), 25 Hz (four poles) and 50 Hz (two poles).…”
Section: Variability Of Urban Seismic Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the discussion in Coward et al [32] )). For real (noisy) measurements at small values of dR, the material attenuation is difficult to determine, and, as will be shown below, the measurements in this paper do not show the exponential decay implied by Eq.…”
Section: Current Empirical Criteria For Estimating Cosmetic Building mentioning
confidence: 99%