2022
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing restricted and unusual interests in autistic youth

Abstract: A broad range of interests characterized by unusual content and/or intensity, labeled as circumscribed interests (CI), are a core diagnostic feature of autism. Recent evidence suggests that a distinction can be drawn between interests that, although characterized by unusually high intensity and/or inflexibility, are otherwise common in terms of their content (e.g., an interest in movies or animals), labeled as restricted interests (RI), and interests that are generally not salient outside of autism (e.g., an i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the three profiles demonstrated different sex compositions with males significantly more likely to be in the low CI profile and females significantly more likely to be in the predominantly RI profile. Although it is difficult to situate findings in the context of previous literature as this is the first study to capture subgroups based on CI patterns, that males were more likely to be in the low CI profile is somewhat inconsistent with previous studies that have reported no sex-based differences in the intensity of CI (Anthony et al, 2013;Sutherland et al, 2017;Spackman et al, 2022b). However, the finding that females were more likely than males to be in the Predominantly RI profile, is broadly consistent with previous literature that suggests the interests of autistic females more closely align with the interests of neurotypical females than autistic males (Harrop et al, 2018;Bourson and Prevost, 2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the three profiles demonstrated different sex compositions with males significantly more likely to be in the low CI profile and females significantly more likely to be in the predominantly RI profile. Although it is difficult to situate findings in the context of previous literature as this is the first study to capture subgroups based on CI patterns, that males were more likely to be in the low CI profile is somewhat inconsistent with previous studies that have reported no sex-based differences in the intensity of CI (Anthony et al, 2013;Sutherland et al, 2017;Spackman et al, 2022b). However, the finding that females were more likely than males to be in the Predominantly RI profile, is broadly consistent with previous literature that suggests the interests of autistic females more closely align with the interests of neurotypical females than autistic males (Harrop et al, 2018;Bourson and Prevost, 2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…However, the finding that females were more likely than males to be in the Predominantly RI profile, is broadly consistent with previous literature that suggests the interests of autistic females more closely align with the interests of neurotypical females than autistic males (Harrop et al, 2018;Bourson and Prevost, 2022). Further, by identifying a profile of interests, mostly consisting of RI, that females are more likely to display, this study builds on previous group-level findings using the DARB that reported several specific RI items were more commonly endorsed by females than males-including having a favorite person or an interest in music, art, literature, and psychology (Spackman et al, 2022b). In summary, the use of person-centered analysis in the current study has identified clusters of participants that were further differentiated by key demographic, cognitive, and clinical validators, thus providing important, albeit preliminary, evidence that different profiles of CI presentations may be underpinned by distinct cognitive mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations