2016
DOI: 10.1640/0002-8444-106.2.87.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Quantitative Variation in the Glossopodia of Three Western North AmericanIsoëtesSpecies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even characters once thought to be useful in delimiting natural groups within the genus, such as habitat (Engelmann, 1882) or megaspore morphology (Pfeiffer, 1922), have been found to be labile (Cox and Hickey, 1984;Taylor and Hickey, 1992;Budke et al, 2005;Hickey, 2007;Bagella et al, 2011). And while some characters, such as the glossopodium (the portion of the ligule internal to the leaf), have shown some diagnostic potential (Sharma and Singh, 1984;Pant et al, 2000;Shaw and Hickey, 2005;Singh et al, 2010;Freund, 2016), actually examining and interpreting these structures requires considerable histological and computational effort, making them ill-suited for field identification. This absence of consistent, dependable characters creates a paradox: the lack of reliable traits impedes the inference of phylogenies or classifications in the genus, but without a phylogeny, examining character evolution is exceptionally difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even characters once thought to be useful in delimiting natural groups within the genus, such as habitat (Engelmann, 1882) or megaspore morphology (Pfeiffer, 1922), have been found to be labile (Cox and Hickey, 1984;Taylor and Hickey, 1992;Budke et al, 2005;Hickey, 2007;Bagella et al, 2011). And while some characters, such as the glossopodium (the portion of the ligule internal to the leaf), have shown some diagnostic potential (Sharma and Singh, 1984;Pant et al, 2000;Shaw and Hickey, 2005;Singh et al, 2010;Freund, 2016), actually examining and interpreting these structures requires considerable histological and computational effort, making them ill-suited for field identification. This absence of consistent, dependable characters creates a paradox: the lack of reliable traits impedes the inference of phylogenies or classifications in the genus, but without a phylogeny, examining character evolution is exceptionally difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%