2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing partition functions of the vertex model

Abstract: We characterize which graph parameters are partition functions of a vertex model over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 (in the sense of de la Harpe and Jones [4]). We moreover characterize when the vertex model can be taken so that its moment matrix has finite rank. 6 In [8] it is called an edge coloring model. Colors are also called states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 4 deals with some framework, which we need to prove Theorem 1. This framework is similar to the framework developed in [5]. In particular, the connection with the invariant theory of the symplectic group will become clear there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Section 4 deals with some framework, which we need to prove Theorem 1. This framework is similar to the framework developed in [5]. In particular, the connection with the invariant theory of the symplectic group will become clear there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Theorem 1.) We note that no matter what value we choose for , this f is never the (ordinary) partition function of an edge-coloring model, as follows from the results in [5], see also [17,Proposition 5.6]. It turns out that skew-partition functions are graph parameters satisfying the modified conditions in (2), and moreover, these are the only graph parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then the first inequality in (8) follows from the fact that π S,U (C S ) is a GL(V )-orbit in F U , and that C U has minimal dimension among all GL(V )-orbits in F U . By the maximality of dim(C U ), we have equality throughout (8). As π S,U (C S ) is a GL(V )-orbit and as C U is the unique orbit in F U of minimal dimension, (7) follows.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorems 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus we deal with invariants of ordinary directed graphs, with no ordering of edges. This case was considered in [8], and Theorem 1 forms a generalization of its result.…”
Section: Examples (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a 'k-join lemma' is given below that simplifies the proof. The complex case, as studied in [4], [21], demands different conditions and machinery, and requires (so far) the dimension of the vertex model to be specified in the theorem.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%