Characterizing Organizational Lifecycle through Strategic and Structural Flexibility: Insights from MSMEs in Mexico

Abstract

Today’s lifespan of companies tends to be low in the so-called micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). Organizational life cycle (OLC) theory indicates that organizational aging is related, but not determined, by the firm chronological age or its size. Therefore, a firm’s aging should be analyzed by other factors such as flexibility. The literature considers flexibility as an essential capability, a source of competitive advantage, and an enabler of long-term growth for MSMEs. However, little attention in emerging economies has been paid to examine the nuances of this concept in relation to the OLC in this type of companies. Additionally, studies tend to analyze flexibility as a general term, ignoring that it is a polymorphic concept. That is why there is a need to research the different categories of flexibility. Drawing on a quantitative approach conducting a factor analysis, a two-step cluster, and decision tree analysis to interrogate data from 257 MSMEs in Mexico, this study provides evidence of different dimensions of strategic and structural flexibility that help to characterize and predict the growth, maturity, and declining stages of MSMEs. Our results show that mature firms present more strategic and structural flexible characteristics than those involved in growth or decline stages. The flexible factors that help classify and predict an MSME in the maturity stage include open communication, decentralized decision making, and formalization. We provide a model with these results to illuminate unaddressed issues regarding the broad term of flexibility and its relationship to OLC.

IT Capabilities, Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Resilience in SMEs Post-COVID-19: A Mediating and Moderating Role of Big Data Analytics Capabilities

“…In the post-pandemic world, businesses try to use all their possible and available effort to bring back their prosperity (Ufua et al,et al 2022 ; Zutshi et al,et al 2021 ), especially for SMEs in which corresponding outcomes are still relevant to their abilities to strategically cope and react to turn negative crisis effect into opportunities (Kraus et al 2020 ; Wenzel et al 2020 ). Many actions are required to get benefits (Angeles et al,et al 2022 ; Davidsson et al,et al 2020 ). Specialized researchers on SMEs continually explore ways to help SMEs relaunch themselves.…”

The Influence of the Barriers of Hybrid Strategy on Strategic Competitive Priorities: Evidence from Oil Companies

“…Flexibility means an organization's ability to appropriately and timely respond to dynamic environment to gain the competitive advantage. This is also known as strategic flexibility (Almeida et al, 2022;Angeles et al, 2022;Katebi et al, 2022;Singh et al, 2021;Taghavifard & Majidian, 2022). A hybrid strategy offers an organization to be more flexible and empowers it to work to the organization's entire strength which in turn boost performance and productivity.…”

Leadership Styles and Organisational Effectiveness in Selected Public Universities in Uganda

“…Adaptability covered change focus (Szamosi & Duxbury, 2002), customer focus (Saxe & Weitz, 1982) and organisational learning (Leufvén et al, 2015). Flexibility was measured in terms of operational (Yousuf et al, 2019), structural (Angeles et al, 2022) and strategic flexibility (Abu-Nahel et al , 2020).The measures of leadership styles were transformational leadership, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles (Avolio et al, 1999). The indicators were measured using a five-anchor Likert scale (where 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3= Not sure; 4 = Agree; and 5 = Strongly disagree).…”

“…Adaptability is concerned with change focus (Szamosi & Duxbury, 2002), customer focus (Saxe & Weitz, 1982) and organisational learning (Leufvén et al, 2015). Flexibility is in terms of operational (Yousuf et al, 2019), structural (Angeles et al, 2022) and strategic flexibility (Abu-Nahel et al (2020).…”