The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2016.1163830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing noise in daily GPS position time series with overlapping Hadamard variance and maximum likelihood estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most crucial indicators of atomic clock performance is frequency stability, which is usually expressed by Allan and Hadamard variances. As for the frequency, drift is easily ignored by the Allan variance, and the Hadamard variance is insensitive to linear frequency drift [ 16 , 17 ]. The Hadamard variance adopts the second difference of the fractional frequencies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most crucial indicators of atomic clock performance is frequency stability, which is usually expressed by Allan and Hadamard variances. As for the frequency, drift is easily ignored by the Allan variance, and the Hadamard variance is insensitive to linear frequency drift [ 16 , 17 ]. The Hadamard variance adopts the second difference of the fractional frequencies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hackl et al [25] reveal that Allan variance is an alternative and accurate method to estimate the rate uncertainty for South African TrigNet network. Due to the good confidence in dealing with divergent noise, Xu and Yue [26] adopted a modified Allan variance approach called overlapping Hadamard variance (OHVAR) to infer the noise components of daily PPP position time series of 12 International GNSS Service (IGS) sites in China. They found that the dominate power-law noise inferred by OHVAR agrees well with that inferred by MLE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these dynamics can only be modelled to some reasonable degree and possibly mitigate some errors with correct stochastic and functional models (He et al, 2017). The stochastic as done by (Klos et al, 2014;He et al, 2016;Xu andYue, 2017) Klos et al (2014) who analysed more than 40 stations belonging to the ASG-EUPOS and EPN networks with 5 years of observations from the area of Sudeten, concluded that the WN+PL noise best describes the error sources for most of the analysed stations. Elsewhere, Goudarzi et al (2015) analysed the behaviour of noise in 112 continuously operating GPS (CGPS) position time series in the eastern part of North America and found out that WN+FN is the best model that describes the stochastic part of the position time series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere, Goudarzi et al (2015) analysed the behaviour of noise in 112 continuously operating GPS (CGPS) position time series in the eastern part of North America and found out that WN+FN is the best model that describes the stochastic part of the position time series. Xu and Yue (2017) in their assessment of the noise characteristics of daily position time series from 12 International GNSS Service sites located in China concluded that the noise model of most sites can be characterized by a combination of WN+FN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation