“…However, the midwall strain parameter derived from radial displacements (E RR ) had the greatest variability among hearts due to the lowest spatial density of tag data in the radial direction on MR‐tagged images . The range of E RR was 7.6%–22.3% (mean 11.6%), similar to the radial strains reported by Young et al (range of E RR : 2.0%–22.0%; mean 15.0%), Lawton et al (range of E RR : 9.0%–16.0%; mean 11.8%) and Piella et al (range of E RR : 14.0%–28.0%), while Kuijer et al , Moore et al , and Bogaert and Rademakers reported a higher range: 26.0%–42.0% (mean 31.0%), 30.0%–52.0% (mean 38.0%), and 32.8%–46.6% (mean 38.5%), respectively. Radial strain was lowest medially, which agrees with previous studies , and was highest at the inferior and the lateral wall than anteriorly or the septal wall.…”