2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2022.104081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing mechanical heterogeneity of coal at nano-to-micro scale using combined nanoindentation and FESEM-EDS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative methods include optical microscope (OM), casting thin section (CTS) [19], field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) [2,16,[20][21][22][23][24], transmission electron microscope (TEM) [25][26][27][28][29], focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIBSEM) [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], focused ion beam helium ion microscope (FIBHIM) [38,39], atomic force microscope (AFM) [40][41][42][43][44][45][46], X-ray computed tomography (X-CT) [12,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]; the quantitative methods can be divided into mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) [5,[55][56][57], constant-rate mercury injection (CRMI) [58][59][60][61], nuclear magnetic resonanc...…”
Section: Methods For Reservoir Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative methods include optical microscope (OM), casting thin section (CTS) [19], field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) [2,16,[20][21][22][23][24], transmission electron microscope (TEM) [25][26][27][28][29], focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIBSEM) [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], focused ion beam helium ion microscope (FIBHIM) [38,39], atomic force microscope (AFM) [40][41][42][43][44][45][46], X-ray computed tomography (X-CT) [12,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]; the quantitative methods can be divided into mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) [5,[55][56][57], constant-rate mercury injection (CRMI) [58][59][60][61], nuclear magnetic resonanc...…”
Section: Methods For Reservoir Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with Figure c, the loading and unloading process can be converted into energy changes. The total energy U t during the nanoindentation test satisfies the following relationship with U c , U p , and U e : U normalt = U normalc + U normalp + U normale U normalp + U normale = prefix∫ 0 h max P d h U normalt = P max ( h max + h k ) 2 The sample fracture toughness K c can be computed using U c , A m , and E r K normalc = U normalc A normalm E normalr …”
Section: Nanoindentation Test Principle and Experimental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with Figure c, the loading and unloading process can be converted into energy changes. The total energy U t during the nanoindentation test satisfies the following relationship with U c , U p , and U e : The sample fracture toughness K c can be computed using U c , A m , and E r …”
Section: Nanoindentation Test Principle and Experimental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations