2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.508785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing low-signature targets in background using spatial and spectral features

Abstract: Developments in the area of signature suppression make it progressively more difficult to recognize targets. Due to the high resolution of modern sensors, it is necessary to take into account small structures as well as the whole target. Measures describing the difference between targets and background are crucial when assessing signature reduction efforts. These measures should be associated with the process of detection of targets in background. Two approaches are feasible, trying to simulate human performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photo-simulation by using human observers as an assessment method of camouflage effectiveness has been used in various forms in the recent decades [1][2][3][4]. Other methodologies have also been tested out, involving video surveillance [5], simulation of human vision [6][7][8][9][10][11], similarity measures of target-background by image analysis techniques [2,11], assessment by simulation of target vehicles against different backgrounds [12], and image sequences taken by approaching sensors [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Photo-simulation by using human observers as an assessment method of camouflage effectiveness has been used in various forms in the recent decades [1][2][3][4]. Other methodologies have also been tested out, involving video surveillance [5], simulation of human vision [6][7][8][9][10][11], similarity measures of target-background by image analysis techniques [2,11], assessment by simulation of target vehicles against different backgrounds [12], and image sequences taken by approaching sensors [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%