Characterizing interactive engagement activities in a flipped introductory physics class

Abstract

Interactive engagement activities are increasingly common in undergraduate physics teaching. As research efforts move beyond simply showing that interactive engagement pedagogies work towards developing an understanding of how they lead to improved learning outcomes, a detailed analysis of the way in which these activities are used in practice is needed. Our aim in this paper is to present a characterization of the type and duration of interactions, as experienced by students, that took place during two introductory physics courses (1A and 1B) at a university in the United Kingdom. Through this work, a simple framework for analyzing lectures-the framework for interactive learning in lectures (FILL), which focuses on student interactions (with the lecturer, with each other, and with the material) is proposed. The pedagogical approach is based on Peer Instruction (PI) and both courses are taught by the same lecturer. We find lecture activities can be categorized into three types: interactive (25%), vicarious interactive (20%) (involving questions to and from the lecturer), and noninteractive (55%). As expected, the majority of both interactive and vicarious interactive activities took place during PI. However, the way that interactive activities were used during non-PI sections of the lecture varied significantly between the two courses. Differences were also found in the average time spent on lecturer-student interactions (28% for 1A and 12% for 1B), although not on student-student interactions (12% and 12%) or on individual learning (10% and 7%). These results are explored in detail and the implications for future research are discussed.

Can dual processing theory explain physics students’ performance on the Force Concept Inventory?

“…The course has a "flipped" structure in which students are expected to do prereadings and an online quiz before the lecture. The lecture time then consists of interactive engagement pedagogies, primarily Peer Instruction (see Wood et al [21] for more details). The average normalized FCI gain for the course is 0.5 AE 0.1.…”

Lecture Capture in Online Learning: A Community of Inquiry Perspective

“…There are multiple examples of learning events in the literature, but for our purposes we are interested in dialogue, and in particular, the kinds of question and answer format which may occur in on campus lectures, where students are able to interact with their instructor, clarify ideas, and engage in short debates. The idea that hearing dialogues is a more interactive experience than listening passively to lectures has been proposed by Wood et al (2016) and there is evidence that observing dialogues is beneficial for learning (McKendree, Lee, Dineen, & Mayes, 1998;McKendree, Stenning, Mayes, Lee, & Cox, 1998). However, the type of dialogue is important, and more research is needed on the length and content of dialogue, and on how to support students to learn from watching dialogue (Muldner et al, 2014).…”

Exploration and Practice of Flipped Class Mode for “Unit Operation of Mixing” Lecture Under the Outcome Based Education Concept

“…The flipped class is a new-type teaching mode oriented by students [1][2][3]. It guarantees the achievement of teaching goal, and helps the teachers practice the mission how to teach.…”