2009
DOI: 10.1515/hf.2009.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing hydro-thermal compression behavior of aspen wood strands

Abstract: This study evaluates the microscopic changes of paulownia solid wood panels subjected to thermal compression via characterizing the changes in wood microstructure. The panels, with dimensions of 500 mm × 100 mm × 20 mm, were hot-pressed in a tangential direction by using a laboratory-type hot press at a temperature of either 150 °C or 170 °C and a pressure of 2 MPa for 45 min. Microscopic investigations conducted by light microscopy showed that slightly more damage occurred in the samples compressed at 170 °C … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason aspen is used for OSB is that the material is very low in density-285 to 410 kg/m 3 , but mostly between 300 and 350 kg/m 3 (Peters et al 2002, with a high compaction ratio. The board surface layers in particular are very effectively densified during hot pressing to give a composite of small elements and fissures that is similar in strength properties to undamaged solid parent material (Zhou et al 2009(Zhou et al , 2011. Semple et al (2007) compared the performance of clonal aspen wood of different density (from 328 to 408 kg/m 3 ) in OSB and found that mat compaction and densification was greater for lower density wood strands leading to superior board properties.…”
Section: Thickness Density and Vertical Density Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason aspen is used for OSB is that the material is very low in density-285 to 410 kg/m 3 , but mostly between 300 and 350 kg/m 3 (Peters et al 2002, with a high compaction ratio. The board surface layers in particular are very effectively densified during hot pressing to give a composite of small elements and fissures that is similar in strength properties to undamaged solid parent material (Zhou et al 2009(Zhou et al , 2011. Semple et al (2007) compared the performance of clonal aspen wood of different density (from 328 to 408 kg/m 3 ) in OSB and found that mat compaction and densification was greater for lower density wood strands leading to superior board properties.…”
Section: Thickness Density and Vertical Density Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the required IB, strength and stiffness properties of OSB using low density, low strength aspen logs, the density of core (for IB), and even more so the surface layers (for flexural properties) must be increased much above that of the parent wood (Spelter et al 1996), and the strands plasticise and deform sufficiently to form intimate wood-adhesive-wood contact (Wolcott et al 1990). High degrees of layer densification and associated thickness swelling problems have been studied extensively during development of industrial OSB building products (Xu and Winistorfer 1995;Andrews 1998;Andrews et al 2001;Dai et al 2002;Winistorfer 2000, 2001;Zhou et al 2009). Blomberg and Persson (2004) and Blomberg et al (2006) clearly demonstrated how artificially densified aspen wood swells and largely regains its original shape after 24 h soaking in water.…”
Section: Thickness Swell/water Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the predicted temperature and MC distributions from the heat and mass transfer model, the strand compression modulus at a given time during the press cycle can be determined [2]. Then according to the stress-strain relationship for strand columns in compression, the layer deformation and hence the layer density can be obtained with the above-mentioned iterative method.…”
Section: Vdp Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the function for compression modulus itself was empirically determined by experimental work [2], which also could introduce some uncertainties to the VDP model. If the surface layer densities are overestimated in the model, at a given target panel density, this will unavoidably result in the underestimated core layer densities.…”
Section: Vdp Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%