The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2010
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-103919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Graphene, Graphite, and Carbon Nanotubes by Raman Spectroscopy

Abstract: Recent advances in Raman spectroscopy for characterizing graphene, graphite, and carbon nanotubes are reviewed comparatively. We first discuss the first-order and the double-resonance (DR) second-order Raman scattering mechanisms in graphene, which give rise to the most prominent Raman features. Then, we review phonon-softening phenomena in Raman spectra as a function of gate voltage, which is known as the Kohn anomaly. Finally, we review exciton-specific phenomena in the resonance Raman spectra of single-wall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
360
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 569 publications
(402 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
20
360
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the Raman spectroscopy fits well with the previously observed TEM imgaes. As can be seen in Figure 3a, the Raman spectra of the untreated sample shows two peaks, one at ~1330 cm -1 , called the D-peak and a second peak at ~1580 cm -1 , the G-peak [30][31][32]. As reported for Aerographite, this carbon foams is consits of sp 2 and sp 3 carbon [11], which should be the same behaviour for the presented carbon structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The results from the Raman spectroscopy fits well with the previously observed TEM imgaes. As can be seen in Figure 3a, the Raman spectra of the untreated sample shows two peaks, one at ~1330 cm -1 , called the D-peak and a second peak at ~1580 cm -1 , the G-peak [30][31][32]. As reported for Aerographite, this carbon foams is consits of sp 2 and sp 3 carbon [11], which should be the same behaviour for the presented carbon structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The strength of such interfacial bonding, as evidenced by splitting of the π*feature in Supplementary Figure S6 (Supplementary Information), is greater for the graphene/Ni interface as compared with graphene grown on Cu. The peak shifts of the 2D Raman band can be related to its origin from a double-resonance phonon scattering process; SLG has no graphene layer-layer interaction and the intervalley scattering of the two phonons are degenerate, whereas the number of non-degenerate dispersions increases in bilayered graphene (increasing the number of K points and thus the number of possible scattering events) with the overall consequence of shifting and broadening of the 2D resonance 46,47 . Notably, charge transfer interactions with the underlying substrate can also shift the Raman modes of graphene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between stimulated Raman spectroscopy and coherent phonon spectroscopy is that the incident light is not always an ultrafast pulse in stimulated Raman spectroscopy. For an overview of Raman spectroscopy in graphene-related systems, the reader is referred to the literature [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%