2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing forest disturbances across the Argentine Dry Chaco based on Landsat time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid problems due to cloud cover, changes in illumination, and atmospheric condition, we used all available images from the growing season of each year (1 May through 15 September) to derive yearly composite images 54 . As our spectral index, we used Tasseled Cap Wetness (TCW), as this index is particularly sensitive to forest structure 55 , is robust to spatial and temporal variations in canopy moisture 56 , and consistently outperforms other spectral indices, including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index 53 , for detecting forest disturbance 50,[57][58][59] . As input parameters for the LandTrendr algorithm when detecting forest disturbances, we used a prevalue of −300 TCW units, a minimum disturbance magnitude of 500 TCW units, and a maximum duration of 4 years.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid problems due to cloud cover, changes in illumination, and atmospheric condition, we used all available images from the growing season of each year (1 May through 15 September) to derive yearly composite images 54 . As our spectral index, we used Tasseled Cap Wetness (TCW), as this index is particularly sensitive to forest structure 55 , is robust to spatial and temporal variations in canopy moisture 56 , and consistently outperforms other spectral indices, including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index 53 , for detecting forest disturbance 50,[57][58][59] . As input parameters for the LandTrendr algorithm when detecting forest disturbances, we used a prevalue of −300 TCW units, a minimum disturbance magnitude of 500 TCW units, and a maximum duration of 4 years.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four complementary explanations for this finding are plausible. First, natural disturbances, such as from fires or river-bed migrations are common in the Chaco (Adamoli et al, 1990;Bravo et al, 2001;De Marzo et al, 2021). However, disturbance attribution is not always straightforward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although decision-tree algorithms were found useful in this study, there exists the possibility of testing different machine learning algorithms. For example, Random forest [54], a widely used machine learning algorithm in disturbance-related scientific works [63,64]. Besides, by using such algorithms, the repetition of the modelling steps to select the tree that retrieved better results could be avoided as this algorithm is based on the combination of multiple decision trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%