2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Fatty Liver in vivo in Rabbits, Using Quantitative Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this is the first work to report the correlation between ESD of human liver and MRI-PDFF. Nevertheless, previous studies on rabbit fatty liver found negative correlation between ESD and fat content of the liver [33]. Using different combination of these three QUS parameters estimated using the proposed method with a simple QDA classifier, we were able to discriminate between the steatosis and the non-steatosis class with an accuracy up to 100% and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, this is the first work to report the correlation between ESD of human liver and MRI-PDFF. Nevertheless, previous studies on rabbit fatty liver found negative correlation between ESD and fat content of the liver [33]. Using different combination of these three QUS parameters estimated using the proposed method with a simple QDA classifier, we were able to discriminate between the steatosis and the non-steatosis class with an accuracy up to 100% and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For ESD computation, a Gaussian form factor has been used as it can successfully model the scattering properties of many soft tissues, including liver [20,33]. However, a spherical shell form factor is more appropriate for spherical glass beads, as were used in the phantoms in our experiments [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive accumulation of fatty deposits in the liver altered the spectral content, leading to a significant blue shift in the H-scan US image intensity in the MCD diet animals. With increasing liver fat content, it has been shown that the effective scatterer diameter and density tends to decrease 49 . Lastly, CEUS imaging is sensitive to fatty liver disease progression and can accurately detect vascular features of NASH 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifying tissues has recently evolved from model-based approaches such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques to model-free, DL-based techniques. Nguyen et al [29] demonstrated that QUS techniques are able to detect the presence of steatosis in a rabbit model of fatty liver with a classification accuracy of 84.11%. In a later study, Nguyen et al [5] compared a DL-based classifier to a QUS-based classifier for the problem of fatty liver classifier and found that the DL-based classifier outperformed the QUSbased approach with the accuracy of 74% versus 59%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%