2016
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v27i2.a.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Design Cognition of High School Students: Initial Analyses Comparing those With and Without Pre-Engineering Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kelley found that both groups of students used similar strategies but spent varying time developing solutions. The study published by Wells et al (2016) also used verbal protocol analysis to compare the design cognition of high school students who have had a pre-engineering course experience, high school students who have not, and undergraduate engineering students as part of a larger longitudinal study; they found no significant differences in the design cognition of these different groups.…”
Section: Research Question 3: Impact Of Engineering Design On Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kelley found that both groups of students used similar strategies but spent varying time developing solutions. The study published by Wells et al (2016) also used verbal protocol analysis to compare the design cognition of high school students who have had a pre-engineering course experience, high school students who have not, and undergraduate engineering students as part of a larger longitudinal study; they found no significant differences in the design cognition of these different groups.…”
Section: Research Question 3: Impact Of Engineering Design On Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When design issues in general are brought home to the specificity of their application in Technology education, it becomes clear that there are few studies that have empirically investigated the cognitive nature of Technology learners' design processes at both theoretical and empirical levels (Strimel & Grubbs, 2017;Wells et al, 2016). Recent findings in the literature focusing on the early phases reveal that the behaviours of Technology learners often differ from those of experts in key areas such as problem structuring, depth and breadth of the information sought, and time spent during individual cognitive phases (Atman et al, 2007;Kelley, Capobianco, & Kaluf, 2015;Mohedas, Daly, & Sienko, 2015).…”
Section: Designing As Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some scholars are able to identify the cognitive phases involved during Technology learners' design processes (Kelley et al, 2015;Wells et al, 2016), they do not elaborate on the information sources that learners use during these cognitive phases. Gonçalves et al (2016) suggests that the use of information sources during design activities supports the transition between problem structuring and problem solving.…”
Section: Information Access and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, developing the Lin et al / Using 3D Printing in STEM Learning Activities 2 / 13 engineering design process is not an easy task. When studying the engineering design process of senior high school students, many scholars discovered that the students' performances in several areas, including defining questions, gathering data, and modeling, had yet to improve, and thus deemed it worthwhile to further reflect on how to improve the students' performance in these respects (Atman, Adams, Cardella, Turns, Mosborg, & Saleem, 2007;Wells, Lammi, Gero, Grubbs, Paretti, & Williams, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%