2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing continuous powder mixing using residence time distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of operating parameters and powder properties on mixing performance within continuous convective blenders has been studied extensively [35][36][37][38][39]41,45]. Marikh et al [36,45] have studied the influence of mass flow rate, impeller speed and bulk powder properties on the hold up within a pilot-scale continuous mixer for different agitator types.…”
Section: Continuous Mixersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of operating parameters and powder properties on mixing performance within continuous convective blenders has been studied extensively [35][36][37][38][39]41,45]. Marikh et al [36,45] have studied the influence of mass flow rate, impeller speed and bulk powder properties on the hold up within a pilot-scale continuous mixer for different agitator types.…”
Section: Continuous Mixersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics can be calculated from experimental data such as concentration measured at the outlet of the mixer. Composition can be assessed using near infrared spectroscopy (NIR) [34,35,[41][42][43][44]. In addition, flow trajectories within the mixer can be studied using positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) [39].…”
Section: Continuous Mixersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations were realised with the temperature of the working liquid (tap water) variation between 20 and 25 o C. The volumetric fl ow rate of liquid were varied from 0.0084 to 0.0167 dm 3 • s -1 . The working volume (volume of TRMF generator) was equal to 5 • 10 -3 m 3 .…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the several other modeling approaches which exist in literature, for example, Monte-Carlo methods [12], continuum and constitutive models [13], statistical models [14,15], compartment models [16,17], RTD models [18,19] and hybrid models [20,21], discrete element modeling (DEM) is one of the fundamental modeling approaches that is able to capture the particle level physics. In DEM, each particle is treated as a discrete entity where the trajectory of the particles is tracked and the collision between particles is modeled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%