2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12351-017-0309-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing compromise solutions for investors with uncertain risk preferences

Abstract: The optimum portfolio selection for an investor with particular preferences was proven to lie on the normalized efficient frontier between two bounds defined by the Ballestero (1998) bounding theorem. A deeper understanding is possible if the decision-maker is provided with visual and quantitative techniques. Here, we derive useful insights as a way to support investor's decision-making through: (i) a new theorem to assess balance of solutions; (ii) a procedure and a new plot to deal with discrete efficient fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These empirical results agree with other theoretical results presented by Ballestero (2007) and Salas‐Molina et al. (2019) in the same context of portfolio selection. These results can be summarised as follows: the larger the value of p in Zeleny–Yu utility UZY$U_{\text{ZY}}$ from Equation (5), the more balance is achieved by recommended portfolios or, in other words, the further the portfolios from corner solutions.…”
Section: An Application In Portfolio Selectionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These empirical results agree with other theoretical results presented by Ballestero (2007) and Salas‐Molina et al. (2019) in the same context of portfolio selection. These results can be summarised as follows: the larger the value of p in Zeleny–Yu utility UZY$U_{\text{ZY}}$ from Equation (5), the more balance is achieved by recommended portfolios or, in other words, the further the portfolios from corner solutions.…”
Section: An Application In Portfolio Selectionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When considering vector of weights w in Zeleny–Yu utility in Equation (5), we find two different approaches in the literature. In CP, we usually find weights raised to metric p (see, e.g., Ballestero and Romero, 1996; Salas‐Molina et al., 2019). This course of action results in the following weighted multiplicative function as shown in the Appendix: limp0j=1qwjpzjpfalse(1/pfalse)badbreak=j=1qwjzjfalse(1/qfalse).$$\begin{equation} \lim _{p \rightarrow 0} {\left[ \sum _{j=1}^q w_j^p z_j^p \right]}^{(1/p)} = {\left[ \prod _{j=1}^q w_j z_j \right]}^{(1/q)}.…”
Section: Compromise Programming With Multiplicative Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other works, the order of non-linearity is used either as an expression of ethical principles [36,37], or as indicative of the balance of solutions [38,39]. We here follow the approach of using the order of non-linearity as an expression of the uncertainty, hence providing more flexibility to decision-makers.…”
Section: Managerial Insights and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also that the area under curve z (E, B) is higher than the area under curve z(E, B). Adapting the recommendations in Salas-Molina et al (2017) to our context, we propose the following quantitative definition of shared value creation.…”
Section: Quantitative Foundations Of Shared Value Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%