2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing cerebellar activity during autobiographical memory retrieval: ALE and functional connectivity investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with a large body of literature indicating that the cerebellum is part of wholebrain language networks (Price, 2012), is active during a variety of reading and language tasks (Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009;Stoodley et al, 2012;Keren-Happuch et al, 2014;Mariën et al, 2014), and that the degree of rightward lateralization in the cerebellum is associated with better core language skills (Berl et al, 2014). Our findings also support and extend previous studies showing that right lobules VI/Crus I/II are engaged during many types of semantic processing (e.g., Xiang et al, 2003;Price, 2012;Addis et al, 2016;Lopes et al, 2016). Broadly speaking, our results add to a growing literature supporting a role for the cerebellum in language processing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are consistent with a large body of literature indicating that the cerebellum is part of wholebrain language networks (Price, 2012), is active during a variety of reading and language tasks (Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009;Stoodley et al, 2012;Keren-Happuch et al, 2014;Mariën et al, 2014), and that the degree of rightward lateralization in the cerebellum is associated with better core language skills (Berl et al, 2014). Our findings also support and extend previous studies showing that right lobules VI/Crus I/II are engaged during many types of semantic processing (e.g., Xiang et al, 2003;Price, 2012;Addis et al, 2016;Lopes et al, 2016). Broadly speaking, our results add to a growing literature supporting a role for the cerebellum in language processing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with this idea, functional neuroimaging studies have implicated the MTL, as well as frontal, parietal, and lateral temporal lobe regions in the retrieval of EAMs (Addis et al, 2016; Martinelli et al, 2013; Svoboda et al, 2006). Lesion studies have corroborated these neuroimaging findings and shown that EAM retrieval not only depends on the MTL (Cermak & O’Connor, 1983; Grilli & Verfaellie, 2014; Tulving, 1985) but also cortical regions of the episodic memory neural network (Berryhill et al, 2007; Bertossi et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The cerebellar hemispheres seem to be involved in a wide variety of cognitive tasks, including language processing (Desmond et al, 1998;Frings et al, 2006;McDermott et al, 2003;Tieleman et al, 2005), working memory (Desmond et al, 1997;Salmi et al, 2010), and other executive functions (Schall et al, 2003;Blackwood et al, 2004). Remarkably, the posterior cerebellar hemispheres are functionally connected to different areas within the prefrontal cortices (Addis et al, 2016;Habas et al, 2009;O'Reilly et al, 2009). Moreover, like the prefrontal cortices, the lateral regions of cerebellar hemispheres are the most recent parts to evolve (Ito, 2008).…”
Section: The Cerebellum's Role: Craving or Prediction?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, including resting-state and task-related functional connectivity confirm cerebellar relationships between the cortical and subcortical areas involved in addiction, and specifically in craving. Concretely, co-activations and functional connections between cerebellum and cortical structures, such as dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Habas et al, 2009;Leutgeb et al, 2016;Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012), orbitofrontal cortex (Addis et al, 2016;Habas et al, 2009;Leutgeb et al, 2016), anterior cingulate cortex (Addis et al, 2016;Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012;Zeng et al, 2012), insula (Addis et al, 2016;Habas et al, 2009;Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012), and inferior frontal gyrus (Addis et , 2016;Moulton et al, 2011;Tomasi and Volkow, 2011) have been reported. Other subcortical structures such as amygdala (Leutgeb et al, 2016;Sang et al, 2012;Zeng et al, 2012), hippocampus (Onuki et al, 2015;Sang et al, 2012;Zeng et al, 2012), ventral tegmental area (Carnell et al, 2014;Etkin et al, 2009;Kline et al, 2016;Kwon et al, 2014), dorsal striatum (Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012;Tomasi and Volkow, 2011), and ventral striatum (Cauda et al, 2011;Cservenka et al, 2014;Koehler et al, 2013) also have demonstrated to be connected to the cerebellum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%