2024
DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures9020020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Bridge Thermal Response for Bridge Load Rating and Condition Assessment: A Parametric Study

Artem Marchenko,
Rolands Kromanis,
André G. Dorée

Abstract: Temperature is the main driver of bridge response. It is continuously applied and may have complex distributions across the bridge. Daily temperature loads force bridges to undergo deformations that are larger than or equal to peak-to-peak traffic loads. Bridge thermal response must therefore be accounted for when performing load rating and condition assessment. This study assesses the importance of characterizing bridge thermal response and separating it from traffic-induced response. Numerical replicas (i.e.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bridge static response results from applied loads that, in general, are at lower frequencies than bridge natural frequencies. Two examples are the response (i) from traffic on the bridge, e.g., pedestrians, vehicles, trains crossing a bridge [ 84 , 85 ], and (ii) static load testing, such as placing load trucks or other known loads on specific locations on the bridge [ 86 , 87 ]. Studies relevant to such cases are reviewed in this section.…”
Section: Computer Vision-based Smartphone Sensing For Bridge Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bridge static response results from applied loads that, in general, are at lower frequencies than bridge natural frequencies. Two examples are the response (i) from traffic on the bridge, e.g., pedestrians, vehicles, trains crossing a bridge [ 84 , 85 ], and (ii) static load testing, such as placing load trucks or other known loads on specific locations on the bridge [ 86 , 87 ]. Studies relevant to such cases are reviewed in this section.…”
Section: Computer Vision-based Smartphone Sensing For Bridge Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%