2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Breakthrough Cancer Pain Using Ecological Momentary Assessment with a Smartphone App: Feasibility and Clinical Findings

Abstract: Background: mobile applications (apps) facilitate cancer pain ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and provide more reliable data than retrospective monitoring. The aims of this study are (a) to describe the status of persons with cancer pain when assessed ecologically, (b) to analyze the utility of clinical alarms integrated into the app, and (c) to test the feasibility of implementing an app for daily oncological pain monitoring. Methods: in this feasibility study, 21 patients (mean age = 56.95 years, SD = … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important finding, as prior work has demonstrated challenges in ensuring health care providers understand and act upon patient-reported outcome data [ 61 ]. Given this reality, we concur with Villegas et al [ 48 ] and suggest that a more effective (or at least equally important) strategy is to focus on how remote monitoring data can inform real-time intervention strategies delivered directly to patients and caregivers for more empowered symptom self-management. We hypothesize that different “buckets” of data exist, and who needs access to these data—when, and how, and in what ways—will vary, temporally and by end user.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is an important finding, as prior work has demonstrated challenges in ensuring health care providers understand and act upon patient-reported outcome data [ 61 ]. Given this reality, we concur with Villegas et al [ 48 ] and suggest that a more effective (or at least equally important) strategy is to focus on how remote monitoring data can inform real-time intervention strategies delivered directly to patients and caregivers for more empowered symptom self-management. We hypothesize that different “buckets” of data exist, and who needs access to these data—when, and how, and in what ways—will vary, temporally and by end user.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is a noteworthy finding given the severity of illness experienced by palliative care patient populations, which can make data collection extremely difficult or impossible [ 53 - 55 ]. We believe this underscores and confirms the value patients and caregivers place on meaningful self-reported outcomes [ 44 , 56 , 57 ] and validates other work seeking to use EMAs to collect data about cancer pain [ 48 ]. We also believe that participants’ acceptance of answering EMAs about pain in real time was enhanced by our intentional choice to use smart watches versus a mobile phone app.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, in relation to the feasibility results, we anticipate that the participants will be very satisfied with the app in terms of acceptability and usability (i.e., "I needed to learn many things before I could start using the system"). Based on previous similar research [45,46], we also anticipate that the clinicians will be satisfied with the app in terms of perceived utility, low burden, and high intention to use. Regarding the clinical utility of the app, we also hypothesized that the app would allow early detection of low brace adherence, brace-related side effects, and psychological distress associated with brace use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If adequate resources are available, even the so-called best phenotypes (P1 and P2) can benefit from telemedicine. The experience accumulated in the management of patients with cancer pain during the pandemic suggests that many episodes of NP-BTcP are not reported during periodic consultations but are recorded by the patient in the monitoring system [29]. In other words, the impact on quality of life is always present, but both patients and clinicians tend to underestimate the effect [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%