Characterizing and Predicting Outcomes of Communication Delays in Infants and Toddlers: Implications for Clinical Practice

Paul, Rhea; Roth, Froma P.

doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0067)

Cited by 110 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 71 publications

(71 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This has shown that prediction of language outcome is poor if reliance is only placed on expressive language measures, especially when using early parent-report measures of language development Feldman et al, 2005;Henrichs et al, 2011;Westerlund et al, 2006). There is a need for multifactorial predictive risk models that include a wide range of verbal and nonverbal factors (Desmarais et al, 2008;Ellis & Thal, 2008;Hawa & Spanoudis, 2014;Olswang, Rodriguez, & Timler, 1998;Paul & Roth, 2011;Zambrana, Pons, Eadie, & Ystrom, 2014). To date, numerous perinatal (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A substantial number of LTs move into the typical range on standardised language measures during the preschool period, but a subset continues with language impairments throughout the school years (Domsch et al, 2012;Ellis & Thal, 2008;Henrichs et al, 2011;Moyle, Weismer, Evans, & Lindstrom, 2007;Paul & Roth, 2011;Rescorla, 2011;Westerlund, Berglund, & Eriksson, 2006). LTs do not constitute a homogeneous group but present with varied profiles of language and/or social communication skills and deficits which change over time: some present with expressive language problems only, whereas others also evidence limited receptive language and/or social communication skills that border on Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) (Desmarais, Sylvestre, Meyer, Bairati, & Rouleau, 2008;Ellis & Thal, 2008;Hawa & Spanoudis, 2014;Paul & Ellis Weismer, 2013;Paul & Roth, 2011). But although some LTs and young children with ASD share common features, it is important to acknowledge that not all late-talking toddlers with social communication deficits meet diagnostic criteria for ASD.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Body movement imitation and early language as predictors of later social communication and language outcomes: A longitudinal study

Dohmen

Bishop

Chiat

et al. 2016

Autism & Developmental Language Impairments

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and aims Over recent decades much research has focused on detecting predictors of different language trajectories in children with early language delay but there has been very little exploration of social communication trajectories in these children. We report a longitudinal study that investigated the predictive value and clinical significance of elicited body movement imitation and language for later social communication and language outcome in Late Talkers. Methods Participants were 29 German-speaking children who were identified with delayed onset and progression of language at two years and followed up at four years. Novel assessments of posture and gesture imitation were administered at Time 1, together with standardised language measures. All body movement imitation items involved self-other mappings, assumed to rely on sociocognitive capacities. At Time 2, children were assessed on standard language tests, together with parental reports of social communication. Results Early language skills at Time 1 were significantly associated with later language outcome and body movement imitation skills at Time 1 with later social communication outcome. Logistic regression analyses revealed that body movement imitation as well as language at Time 1 added significantly to the prediction of language outcome at Time 2, whereas only body movement imitation made a significant contribution to the prediction of social communication outcome at Time 2. Conclusions and implications Theoretically, results highlight the need to account for the heterogeneity of different language and communication trajectories in children with early language delay and point to the importance of sociocognitive difficulties observed in some of these children. Clinically, this study demonstrated that body movement imitation measures have the potential to improve the identification of pre-schoolers who are at risk of later social communication and language problems.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Body movement imitation and early language as predictors of later social communication and language outcomes: A longitudinal study

Dohmen

Bishop

Chiat

et al. 2016

Autism & Developmental Language Impairments

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…10−15% lastest ei arene kõne ootus päraselt (Desmarais, Sylvestre, Meyer, Bairati, & Rouleau, 2008;Paul & Roth, 2011). Kõne arengu mahajäämust märgitakse alates 2 aasta vanusest, kui eeldatud lihtsaid lauseid pole lapse kõnesse ilmunud.…”

Section: Sissejuhatusunclassified

“…Üldi selt peetakse selleks vanuseks 5 aastat (Paul & Roth, 2011;Rescorla, 2011). Kõnehilistusega lapsed, kes 5aastaselt on kõne arengu näitajate poolest veel EK lastest märgatavalt nõrgemad, on tõenäoliselt juba raskema ja püsivama puudega -nn spetsiifilise kõnearengupuudega (vt Hallap, Padrik, & Raudik, 2014;Padrik, 2014).…”

Section: Kõne Arengu Hilistuse Ehk Peetusega Lapsedunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

3-4aastaste eesti laste kõne grammatiline profiil

Padrik¹,

Hallap²,

Raudik³

2016

EHA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Töö eesmärk on kirjeldada ja võrrelda eakohase ja hilistunud kõnearengu grammatilisi profiile ning leida tunnused, mille alusel on võimalik eristada kõne arengu poolest riskirühma kuuluvaid lapsi. Meetodiks on pöörd- ja käändsõnavormide kasutuse ning lauseloome suunatud esilekutsumine ja järelekordamine. Uurimuse valimi moodustavad 149 3aastast ja 186 4aastast eakohase arenguga last. Kontrollrühmaks on 61 kõne arengu hilistusega samaealist last. Uurimistulemustest selgub, et 3- ja 4aastased lapsed erinevad oma grammatilise profiili poolest oluliselt, kusjuures 4aastased valdavad keelesüsteemi uuritud oskuste ja keelendite piires. Kõne arengu hilistusega laste grammatiline profiil järgib eakohase arenguga laste oma, sarnanedes nooremate laste profiiliga. Tulemused võimaldavad laste kõne arengut hindavatel spetsialistidel eristada 3−4aastaste laste grammatika arengule omaseid tüüpilisi ja ebatüüpilisi tunnuseid ning varakult märgata kõne arengu poolest riskirühma kuuluvaid lapsi. Summary

show abstract

Terminology, Classification, Description, Measurement, Assessment and Targets

Bowen

2015

Children's Speech Sound Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Characterizing and Predicting Outcomes of Communication Delays in Infants and Toddlers: Implications for Clinical Practice

Cited by 110 publications

References 71 publications

Body movement imitation and early language as predictors of later social communication and language outcomes: A longitudinal study

Body movement imitation and early language as predictors of later social communication and language outcomes: A longitudinal study

3-4aastaste eesti laste kõne grammatiline profiil

Terminology, Classification, Description, Measurement, Assessment and Targets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About