2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(03)00470-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing and monitoring rockslides from SAR techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite modern technological advances, and the availability of new satellite products, the visual interpretation of airborne photographs is still the most common method to obtain landslide information though several other sources of information that may be used such as optical remote sensing images and LiDARderived topographic information (Ardizzone et al, 2007;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2007;Haneberg et al, 2009;Razak et al, 2013;Martha et al, 2010;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2012). Images acquired by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite sensors are also considered as a powerful source of information, mainly for the recognition of slow-moving landslides (Singhroy and Molch, 2004;Zhao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite modern technological advances, and the availability of new satellite products, the visual interpretation of airborne photographs is still the most common method to obtain landslide information though several other sources of information that may be used such as optical remote sensing images and LiDARderived topographic information (Ardizzone et al, 2007;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2007;Haneberg et al, 2009;Razak et al, 2013;Martha et al, 2010;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2012). Images acquired by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite sensors are also considered as a powerful source of information, mainly for the recognition of slow-moving landslides (Singhroy and Molch, 2004;Zhao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive bibliography contains works on the use of PSI for landslide monitoring [40][41][42][43][44][45]. In many cases, the PSI data have been integrated with in situ monitoring instrumentation [2,[46][47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a complementary tool for conventional surveying, remote sensing offers a synoptic view for landslide characterization and prediction [4,5]. Unlike optical remote sensing (that detects changes in spectral signatures), differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry (DInSAR), particularly the multi-temporal SAR interferometry (MT-InSAR), has proved to be effective for surface motion detection and time series analysis (e.g., for phenomena ranging from landslides to tectonics, earthquakes, glacier evolution, volcanism and anthropogenic processes) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. MT-InSAR measures the phase difference of two or multi-temporal SAR acquisitions and can be divided into two categories: persistent scatterer (PS) SAR interferometry (PS-InSAR) [13][14][15] and small baseline SAR interferometry (SB-InSAR) [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%