2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing an unknown pollution source in groundwater resources systems using PSVM and PNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Bashi-Azghadi et al (2010) presented two methodologies for probabilistic characterizing an unknown pollution source in terms of location and amount of leakage using groundwater quality monitoring data. They used probabilistic Fig.…”
Section: Probabilistic Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bashi-Azghadi et al (2010) presented two methodologies for probabilistic characterizing an unknown pollution source in terms of location and amount of leakage using groundwater quality monitoring data. They used probabilistic Fig.…”
Section: Probabilistic Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential application in expert system research is to develop an intelligent vehicle to search autonomously for sources of hazardous chemicals or pollutants (Bashi-Azghadi, Kerachian, Bazargan-Lari, & Solouki, 2010;Zhou, Huang, & Chan, 2004), victims in earthquake wreckage (Hamp et al, 2014) using expert knowledge of chemical plumes. A critical problem in designing such a system is to construct a navigation mechanism which guides the vehicle to track a chemical plume towards its source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some recent studies, RF was not only used as an empirical model in hydrological modeling but also as a flexible method to estimate the uncertainty of other models (De Oña et al, 2012;Loosvelt et al, 2012;Solomatine & Shrestha, 2009). Other types of ML models such as support vector machine and k-nearest neighbors have also been used in many water studies (Bashi-Azghadi et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2006;St-Hilaire et al, 2012;Yoon et al, 2011). However, the rapid expansion of ML methods creates challenges to identify the best approach for specific application contexts, bearing in mind variability in the dominant catchment processes, and also the (often patchy) nature of data available to support the prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%