Characterizing agile supply partnerships in the fashion industry

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate high-involvement and short-term supply\ud relationships, known as agile supply partnerships (ASPs), and explores the conditions that support the\ud development of such inter-organizational relationships.\ud Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative exploratory research design was followed, based on\ud in-depth case studies of Italian fashion footwear manufacturers and their relationships with key suppliers.\ud Findings – ASPs appear to be most relevant in supply material categories which have a high impact\ud on the appearance or functionality of the product. Conversely, in supply categories with a low impact,\ud long-term partnerships are preferred. Four main characteristics of ASPs are identified: they are part of\ud a portfolio of relationships to balance the rigidities of long-term strategic partnerships; they have\ud project-like features; they are developed from a network of pre-qualified suppliers; they are recurring\ud and intermittent rather than continuous or isolated one-off short-term partnerships.\ud Research limitations/implications – The research has been carried out in the context of an Italian\ud footwear district. Further research is required to evaluate the validity of the propositions in other\ud sectors and geographies.\ud Practical implications – The research can help decision makers in the fashion industry, and\ud potentially other sectors affected by high turbulence, to identify when ASPs are most appropriate and\ud what characteristics they should have.\ud Originality/value – This research contributes to the literature on agility by empirically evaluating\ud the apparent paradox related to the specific characteristics of supply relationships required to foster an\ud agile strategy and by clarifying the conditions under which fashion companies develop ASPs

Understanding supply chain analytics capabilities and agility for data-rich environments

“…Therefore, we propose that SCAC will have a significant positive impact on FPER through SCAG. SCAG is now considered a key enabler of supply chain success in an extremely turbulent and fluctuating economic context (I. van Hoek, Harrison et al 2001, Sharifi, Ismail et al 2006, Sharifi, Ismail et al 2009, Najafi Tavani, Sharifi et al 2013, Cerruti, Mena et al 2016) that seeks to create business value and sustain a particular competitive advantage (Ngai, Chau et al 2011). For example, (Dwayne Whitten, Green et al 2012) argued that the success of supply chain members requires an agile supply chain environment.…”

“…(p. 30). As an operational (Liu, Ke et al 2013, Yang 2014 and relational capability (Yang 2014), agility allows firms not only to quickly respond to customer requests and market changes (I. van Hoek, Harrison et al 2001), but also to face market uncertainty (Sharifi, Ismail et al 2006, Chiang, Kocabasoglu-Hillmer et al 2012, foster supply chain collaboration (Dwayne Whitten, Green et al 2012) and achieve time-to-market (Cerruti, Mena et al 2016). It also enhances product customization, delivery performance, and products development time (Swafford, Ghosh et al 2008), while speeding access to new business opportunities (Sharifi, Ismail et al 2006).…”

Infrastructure framework and manufacturing supply chain agility: the role of delivery dependability and time to market

“…However, traditional production/distribution processes have been radically changed and most firms were obliged to redesign their manufacturing network in many different countries (Cerruti et al, 2016;Fayezi and Zomorrodi, 2015;Chan et al, 2006). Therefore, there are many challenges facing firms such as getting a product and service at the right time, to the right place, in right quantity, in right bills and at the lowest cost.…”

The Six Sigma framework improves the awareness and management of supply-chain risk

“…The marketplace is characterized by turbulence and uncertainty (Cerruti et al, 2016;Kumar Sharma and Bhat, 2014;Oloruntoba and Kov acs, 2015;Song et al, 2016), which increases the exposure to risks in the supply chains (SCs) (Christopher and Peck, 2004;Kei Tse et al, 2016;Mandal, 2014). Companies face significant challenges when managing and reducing cumulative environmental risks and impacts (Karimah et al, 2016); and organizations need to prepare themselves to cope with crises from a variety of sources (Olson and Dash Wu, 2010).…”