2015
DOI: 10.1657/aaar0014-014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Above- and Belowground Carbon Partitioning in Forest Trees along an Altitudinal Gradient using Area-Based Indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these observations suggest that in cold environments, maintaining a high proportion of absorptive root mass (Fig. ) may be an efficient way to compensate for limited nutrient availability not only along latitudinal gradients, but also along altitudinal temperature‐related gradients, as shown in studies from temperate and tropical mountain gradients with decreasing temperature leading to marked allocation shifts to the fine‐root system and root morphological changes (Girardin et al ., , ; Hertel & Schöling, ; Moser et al ., ; Mao et al ., ). Nevertheless, slower growth rates in high‐latitude conditions suggest that in addition to adaptive adjustments to maximize nutrient uptake, plants may also reduce nutrient constraints via slow plant growth (Marschner, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, these observations suggest that in cold environments, maintaining a high proportion of absorptive root mass (Fig. ) may be an efficient way to compensate for limited nutrient availability not only along latitudinal gradients, but also along altitudinal temperature‐related gradients, as shown in studies from temperate and tropical mountain gradients with decreasing temperature leading to marked allocation shifts to the fine‐root system and root morphological changes (Girardin et al ., , ; Hertel & Schöling, ; Moser et al ., ; Mao et al ., ). Nevertheless, slower growth rates in high‐latitude conditions suggest that in addition to adaptive adjustments to maximize nutrient uptake, plants may also reduce nutrient constraints via slow plant growth (Marschner, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berries and flowers were included when present, and leaf and root litter (visually estimated) were excluded. Below‐ground biomass was further separated by diameter (Mao et al., ; Moser et al., ) into fine (≤1 mm diameter) and coarse (>1 mm diameter) roots. While some have suggested using root order instead of root diameter when inferring root function (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, low temperatures and low N levels lead to higher biomass allocation below ground (Freschet, Swart, & Cornelissen, ; Poorter & Nagel, ; Poorter et al., ), and this pattern is also observed in arctic tundra (Wang et al., ). In fact, root:shoot ratios have been shown to increase with increasing latitude or elevation in forests (Girardin et al., ; Hertel & Schöling, ; Leuschner, Moser, Bertsch, Röderstein, & Hertel, ; Mao et al., ; Moser et al., ; Reich et al., ; Zadworny, McCormack, Mucha, Reich, & Oleksyn, ), as well as in alpine plant communities (Körner & Renhardt, ; Ma et al., ) – a pattern that supports the optimality theory. Given these results, climate change‐induced increases in temperature or nutrient availability in arctic tundra could change plant allocation patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We chose a conservative root orientation factor of 0.5 [ Ji et al ., ], because Wu and Waldron's suggested value (1.2) overestimates c ri by 33–68% [ Fan and Su , ; Hubble et al ., ; Thomas and Pollen‐Bankhead , ]. To calculate the load ( W i ) on the slopes, aboveground biomass was estimated from harvests or from species‐specific allometric equations based on measurements of woody stem diameter and height (Text S2.3) [ Mao et al ., ; Pache et al ., ; Ruiz‐Peinado et al ., ; Zianis et al ., ].…”
Section: Study Area and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%