“…There is a continuing interest in this testing problem, as evidenced by a multitude of papers. The proposed tests may be roughly classified as follows: Arcones (2007), Baringhaus and Henze (1988), Henze and Wagner (1997), Henze and Zirkler (1990), Pudelko (2005), and Tenreiro (2009) consider tests based on the empirical characteristic function, while , Henze, Jiménez-Gamero, and Meintanis (2019), and Henze and Visagie (2019) employ the empirical moment generating function. A classical (and still popular) approach is to consider measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis (see Doornik and Hansen, 2008;Kankainen, Taskinen, and Oja, 2007;Malkovich and Afifi, 1973;Mardia, 1970;Mardia, 1974;Móri, Rohatgi, and Székely, 1993), as supposedly diagnostic tools with regard to the kind of deviation from normality when this hypothesis has been rejected, but the deficiencies of those measures in this regard have been clearly demonstrated (see Baringhaus and Henze, 1991;Baringhaus and Henze, 1992;Henze, 1994aHenze, , 1994bHenze, , 1997b.…”