2021
DOI: 10.1090/btran/94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizations of monadic NIP

Abstract: We give several characterizations of when a complete first-order theory T T is monadically NIP, i.e. when expansions of T T by arbitrary unary predicates do not have the independence property. The central characterization is a condition on finite satisfiability of types. Other characterizations include decompositions of models, the behavior of indiscernibles, and a forbidden configuration. As an application, we prove non-structure results for hereditary classes of finite sub… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is defined in terms of a variant of forking independence -a central concept in stability theory, generalizing independence in vector spaces or algebraic independence. The equivalence (1) ↔ ( 2) is due to Baldwin and Shelah [4], the implications (2) → (3) → ( 4) are due to Shelah [46] and the implication (4) → ( 2) is a very recent result of Braunfeld and Laskowski [14]. Our contribution is the implication (4) → ( 5), and the overall equivalence in the case of ordered binary structures.…”
Section: Second Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is defined in terms of a variant of forking independence -a central concept in stability theory, generalizing independence in vector spaces or algebraic independence. The equivalence (1) ↔ ( 2) is due to Baldwin and Shelah [4], the implications (2) → (3) → ( 4) are due to Shelah [46] and the implication (4) → ( 2) is a very recent result of Braunfeld and Laskowski [14]. Our contribution is the implication (4) → ( 5), and the overall equivalence in the case of ordered binary structures.…”
Section: Second Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Intuitively, if C defines large grids then the product of two sets 𝐴 × 𝐵 can be represented by a set of single elements 𝐶 in some structure S ∈ C. Hence an arbitrary relation 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐴 × 𝐵 can be represented by some subset of 𝐶, so C is monadically independent. This is stated in the following lemma, due to Shelah [46] (see [14]). Lemma 20.…”
Section: Model Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, Braunfeld and Laskowski [BL22] very recently proved that for hereditary classes of structures C that are not monadically stable or monadically dependent, the required obstructions (total orders or arbitrary graphs) can be exhibited by an existential formula ϕ( x, ȳ) in the signature of C , without any additional unary predicates. Among other things, this shows that for hereditary classes of structures, the notions of monadic stability coincides with the more well-known notion of stability, and similarly, monadic dependence coincides with dependence (NIP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%