2021
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.6466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization, theoretical investigation, and biological applications of Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) complexes of a triazene ligand containing a benzothiazole ring

Abstract: Herein, Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) complexes of a previously synthesized triazene ligand, namely, (E)-2-(3-(4-nitrophenyl)triaz-1-en-1-yl)benzo [d]thiazole (L), were prepared. The metal:ligand ratio of complexes was determined by molar ratio method, and complexes were synthesized based on the result ratio (1:2 for Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) complexes, and (1:1) for Cu(II) and Mn(II)). The complexes were characterized by infrared (IR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopies, mag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthesized complex ( 1 ) having Mn(II) metal possess the value of magnetic susceptibility of 5.99 BM, and it is in well accordance with the values previously reported for octahedral Mn(II) chelates and permits us to assign a value of S = 5/2 of effective spin for this Mn(II) complex 36 . Magnetic moment of 4.37 BM for complex 2 having Co(II) metal suggests octahedral geometry for complex 2 , which is paramagnetic with an effective spin value S = 3/2 37,38 . Complex 3 having Ni(II) metal has no value of magnetic moment as it is diamagnetic (ligand is strong field).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Synthesized complex ( 1 ) having Mn(II) metal possess the value of magnetic susceptibility of 5.99 BM, and it is in well accordance with the values previously reported for octahedral Mn(II) chelates and permits us to assign a value of S = 5/2 of effective spin for this Mn(II) complex 36 . Magnetic moment of 4.37 BM for complex 2 having Co(II) metal suggests octahedral geometry for complex 2 , which is paramagnetic with an effective spin value S = 3/2 37,38 . Complex 3 having Ni(II) metal has no value of magnetic moment as it is diamagnetic (ligand is strong field).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…36 Magnetic moment of 4.37 BM for complex 2 having Co(II) metal suggests octahedral geometry for complex 2, which is paramagnetic with an effective spin value S = 3/2. 37,38 Complex 3 having Ni(II) metal has no value of magnetic moment as it is diamagnetic (ligand is strong field).…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic moment of 4.84 μ B observed in C3 in accordance with the magnetic moment that is expected to occur during the transition to the d 7 high spin (t 2g 5 e g 2 ) configuration. Lastly, the C4 complex showcased two distinct bands at wavelengths of 535 and 630 nm, associated with the 2 B 1g → 2 E 2g and 2 B 1g → 2 A 1g configurations in the tetrahedral complex . The presented data in Table underscores that the C4 complex displays a moment of magnetic attraction of 1.75 μ B , aligning with a transition toward the d 9 (e g 4 t 2g 5) configuration. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The purpose of this note is to alert the Applied Organometallic Chemistry community to an alarming number of publications that report the single heating rate kinetics for thermal decomposition of compounds. According to Scopus, [ 1 ] most recently (i.e., in the years 2021 and 2022) this journal published 21 papers [ 2–22 ] that study the thermal decomposition kinetics as measured by thermogravimetry at a single heating rate. The resulting measurements are treated by means of the Coats–Redfern [ 23 ] or Horowitz–Metzger [ 24 ] method in order to evaluate the kinetic parameters, that is, the activation energy, E, preexponential factor, A, and reaction model, g(α) .…”
Section: Step N E (Kj Mol−1) a (S−1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many of the reported values are either too big or too small to be realistic. For example, some of the reported activation energies exceed 400, [9,10] 600, [9,12] 800, [8] and even 3000 [12] kJ mol À1 . Generally, the activation energy of a chemical reaction should not exceed the bond energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%