The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of white poplar and eucalyptus after ionic liquid pretreatment as a function of biomass loading using X-ray diffraction and small angle neutron scattering

Abstract: A systematic study was performed to understand interactions among biomass loading during ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment, biomass type and biomass structures. White poplar and eucalyptus samples were pretreated using 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (EmimOAc) at 110°C for 3h at biomass loadings of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25wt%. All of the samples were chemically characterized and tested for enzymatic hydrolysis. Physical structures including biomass crystallinity and porosity were measured by X-ray diffraction (XR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, it keeps increasing with increasing biomass concentration until 20 wt % . Biomass porosity increases as a result of removal and/or redistribution of biomass components and swelling of biomass samples during pretreatment. , In the previous work, a lower IL-to-biomass ratio during IL pretreatment led to removal of a lesser amount of biomass components and therefore smaller porosity . As shown in the right axis of Figure d, the percentage of recovered solids after pretreatment slightly increases from 80 to 84 wt % with increasing biomass concentrations, consistent with prior work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, it keeps increasing with increasing biomass concentration until 20 wt % . Biomass porosity increases as a result of removal and/or redistribution of biomass components and swelling of biomass samples during pretreatment. , In the previous work, a lower IL-to-biomass ratio during IL pretreatment led to removal of a lesser amount of biomass components and therefore smaller porosity . As shown in the right axis of Figure d, the percentage of recovered solids after pretreatment slightly increases from 80 to 84 wt % with increasing biomass concentrations, consistent with prior work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…SANS and USANS can also track changes in structure of biomass samples during the course of enzymatic digestion, thus offering a unique tool to understand biomass pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. 14,15 Relative changes in porosity of white poplar and eucalyptus after ionic liquid pretreatment were analyzed by SANS in a previous work. 15 In this study, changes in porosity of pine samples as a function of ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment conditions were studied using both SANS and nitrogen adsorption measurements, which demonstrated the applicability of SANS to the study of the porosity of biomass samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, the crystalline form of cellulose is transformed, and the hydrogen bonds between molecules are broken and rearranged, reducing the crystallinity of cellulose and increasing the pores (Yuan et al 2017). Metal ions are often used to promote hydrolysis to pretreat cellulose because the empty orbitals of metal ions can combine with the lone pair of electrons on the β-1,4 glycosidic bond oxygen atom of cellulose (Li et al 2015), thereby activating the carbon-oxygen bond, which is conducive to cellulose hydrolysis.…”
Section: Cellulose Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns over oil prices as well as the harm caused by fossil fuel consumption have accelerated bioeconomy-related research (Mortimer 2019). This includes plants genetically engineered to synthesize valuable compounds (Zhang et al 2015;Eudes et al 2016aEudes et al , 2016b, methods developed to isolate those chemicals or intermediates and a maximum amount of accessible carbon from plant biomass (Neupane et al 2017;Pérez-Pimienta et al 2017;Yuan et al 2017), as well as microorganisms engineered to efficiently convert plant-derived carbon into desirable products (Phelan et al 2015;Goh et al 2018;Sasaki et al 2019; Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%