1999
DOI: 10.2118/99-13-49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Wettability From Spontaneous Imbibition Measurements

Abstract: FIGURE 4: Effect of aging time on oil recovery by spontaneous imbibition vs. time. FIGURE 5: Oil recovery by spontaneious imbibition vs. dimensionless time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation made by Tang and Morrow 89 on the variation in wettability towards increasing water-wetness also showed similar cluster of the endpoint wetting-state value using the spontaneous imbibition measurement of wettability discussed by Ma et al 27 . It is pertinent to note that there may be no basis for comparing the two results, in terms of the endpoint cluster of the wetting indices for the different cores, as the wettability determination methods used are based on two different approaches.…”
Section: Impact Of Low-salinity Waterflood (Ambient and Elevated Tempsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation made by Tang and Morrow 89 on the variation in wettability towards increasing water-wetness also showed similar cluster of the endpoint wetting-state value using the spontaneous imbibition measurement of wettability discussed by Ma et al 27 . It is pertinent to note that there may be no basis for comparing the two results, in terms of the endpoint cluster of the wetting indices for the different cores, as the wettability determination methods used are based on two different approaches.…”
Section: Impact Of Low-salinity Waterflood (Ambient and Elevated Tempsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This method proposed by Ma et al 27 addresses specific limitations of the Amott/Harvey and the USBM methods with respect to certain observed capillary pressure effects, namely (1) the inability of the Amott/Harvey index to discriminate between systems that attain residual non-wetting phase saturation without change in sign of the imbibition capillary pressure (usually for strongly wetted system; and (2) the inability of the USBM method to recognize variation in wetting behavior for contact angles ranging from 0° to 55°. Within this range, the area under the forced imbibition curve is zero.…”
Section: Spontaneous Imbibition Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed studies on self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of hexadecanethiol and mercaptohexadecanoic acid on gold have been prepared to investigate deviations from the Cassie equation [53]. Hysteresis between advancing and receding conditions was greatest not for surfaces with alternating strips of high and low contact-angle material, but for smooth gold surfaces covered with a uniform monolayer that terminated in acid groups, perhaps due to a surface reconstruction process [54].…”
Section: Hysteresis Between Water-receding and Water-advancing Conditmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an increasing tendency to measure recovery rate during the spontaneous imbibition steps of the Amott test. Imbibition curves for strongly water-wet conditions provide a basis for estimating the effect of wettability on the measured imbibition rates [53,54,55].…”
Section: Measurement Of Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods describe wettability in terms of numbers for the purpose of comparison between different systems. These methods include contact angle (Adamson 1982), Amott (Amott 1959), Amott-Harvey (Boneau and Clampitt 1977;Trantham and Clampitt 1977), USBM (Donaldson et al 1969), combined Amott/USBM (Sharma and Wunderlich 1985), relative imbibition rate (Denekas et al 1959), total capillary pressure curves (Longeron et al 1995), relative pseudo work of imbibition (Ma et al 1999), modified Amott (Zhou et al 2000), NMR relaxometry (Fleury and Deflandre 2003), chemical adsorption (Strand et al 2006) and the recent method by (in this study referred to as MPMS, after the initials in their last names).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%