Handbook of Nanocellulose and Cellulose Nanocomposites 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9783527689972.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Various Kinds of Nanocellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystallinity index (CI) was calculated by using equation 1for those planes and it was 74.38%, as predicted according to acid concentration during hydrolysis period. The CI value obtained is comparable to nano-cellulose reported in many literatures [28,29,32]. The small deviations showed is due to the aberrant hydrolysis process.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The crystallinity index (CI) was calculated by using equation 1for those planes and it was 74.38%, as predicted according to acid concentration during hydrolysis period. The CI value obtained is comparable to nano-cellulose reported in many literatures [28,29,32]. The small deviations showed is due to the aberrant hydrolysis process.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…From the value of the zeta potential, it can be concluded that the suspension of CNFs is stable because the absolute value was higher than –25 mV [34]. This value signifies that there was enough mutual repulsion resulting in colloidal stability which could be an essential requirement for improving the mechanical properties of the nanocellulose based composites [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNC crystallite sizes were estimated using the Scherrer equation [35]: L = Kλ / ß 1/2 Cosθ , where, L is the crystal dimension perpendicular to the diffracting planes with hkl Miller indices, λ is the wavelength of X-ray radiation, ß 1/2 is the full width of the diffraction peak measured at half maximum height (FWHM), θ is the diffraction angle, and K = 0.94.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%